From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. O'Brian

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:20-cv-01510-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01510-TLN-JDP

07-14-2021

RODRICK JERMON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. L. O'BRIAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Rodrick Jermon Smith (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 23, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed April 23, 2021 (ECF No. 12), are ADOPTED IN FULL; and

2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the September 29, 2020 order (ECF No. 5).

The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. O'Brian

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:20-cv-01510-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. O'Brian

Case Details

Full title:RODRICK JERMON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. L. O'BRIAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01510-TLN-JDP (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)