From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. New York City Police Dept

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 30, 2008
06 Civ. 15436 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2008)

Opinion

06 Civ. 15436 (JSR).

September 30, 2008


ORDER


On August 27, 2008, the Honorable Kevin Nathaniel Fox, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation in the above-captioned matter recommending that the Court dismiss the instant action with respect to defendants Sgt. Anibal Amaya and Det. Thomas Henry.

Plaintiff has failed to file any objection to the Report and Recommendation, and, for that reason alone, has waived any right to further appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985); Mario v. P C Food Markets, Inc., 313 F.3d 758, 766 (2d Cir. 2002); Spence v. Superintendent, Great Meadow Corr. Facility, 219 F.3d 162, 174 (2d Cir. 2000). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation, and, for the reasons stated therein, dismisses plaintiff's complaint as to defendants Amaya and Henry. Clerk to enter judgment.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. New York City Police Dept

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 30, 2008
06 Civ. 15436 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. New York City Police Dept

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP SMITH, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPT., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 30, 2008

Citations

06 Civ. 15436 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Texidor v. N.Y.C. Dept. of Corr.

because this is not a case in which there is a basis in the record for the Court to exercise its discretion…

Emerald Asset Advisors, LLC v. Schaffer

However, if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for…