From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Nevada

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 16, 2023
23-cv-1559-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2023)

Opinion

23-cv-1559-JCM-BNW

10-16-2023

CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE OFFICE; JULIE BUTLER, DIRECTOR OF THE NEVADA DMV; and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants.

AARON D. FORD Attorney General MICHELLE DI SILVESTRO ALANIS (Bar No. 10024) Supervising Senior Deputy Attorney General Personnel Division Attorneys for Defendant State of Nevada ex rel. its Department of Motor Vehicles and Julie Butler Law Offices of Michael P. Balaban Michael P. Balaban (Bar No. 9370) Attorneys for Plaintiff


AARON D. FORD

Attorney General

MICHELLE DI SILVESTRO ALANIS (Bar No. 10024)

Supervising Senior Deputy Attorney General

Personnel Division

Attorneys for Defendant State of Nevada ex rel. its Department of Motor Vehicles and Julie Butler

Law Offices of Michael P. Balaban

Michael P. Balaban (Bar No. 9370)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

Defendants, Department of Motor Vehicles, and Julie Butler, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General, Michelle Di Silvestro Alanis, Supervising Senior Deputy Attorney General, and Plaintiff, Christopher Smith, by and through counsel, Michael P. Balaban, Esq., hereby stipulate pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, to extend the time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint (ECF No. 1-1). This is the first request for an extension of time to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint.

Plaintiff filed his Complaint on August 25, 2023, in the Eighth Judicial District Court. Defendants were served on August 30, 2023. On September 29, 2023, Defendants removed the case to this Court.

Although Defendants' counsel has been reviewing relevant documents and records and working on responding to Plaintiff's Complaint following removal of the case to this Court, counsel requires more time to complete a Response. This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate that the time for Defendants to file their Answer or otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint be extended to November 9, 2023.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Nevada

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 16, 2023
23-cv-1559-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Nevada

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 16, 2023

Citations

23-cv-1559-JCM-BNW (D. Nev. Oct. 16, 2023)