Smith v. Naphtaly

Full title: SMITH v. Naphtaly et al.

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 3, 1896

73 F. 128 (9th Cir. 1896)

Opinion

73 F. 128 (9th Cir. 1896) SMITH v. Naphtaly et al. No. 262. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 3, 1896

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

H. F. Crane and Philip Teare, for appellant.

A. L. Rhodes, for appellees.

Before GILBERT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and MORROW, District Judge.

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

From the action of the court below in sustaining a demurrer to the bill in this case, the complainant appealed. The merits of the case are covered by the decision in the case Beley v. Naphtaly (just filed) 73 F. 120. It is not necessary to do more than to refer to the reason there given in support of our judgment affirming that of the court below. Judgment affirmed.