From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Mullens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jun 24, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-1021 (D.D.C. Jun. 24, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 16-1021

06-24-2016

DAVID L. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. GRAHAM C. MULLENS, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This plaintiff is barred from proceeding in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Smith v. U.S. Judge Terrence W. Boyle, No. 16-cv-998 (D.D.C. June 16, 2016); Smith v. State of North Carolina, No. 5:06-CT-3010 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 2006) (citing cases).

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis [2] is DENIED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's "Application for Temporary Injunction 18 U.S.C. § 3626 and Institutional Equivalent of 60Mont[h] Trust Fund Statement form Pro Se Plaintiff [5] is DENIED [5] is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. If plaintiff wishes to proceed, he may do so upon payment in full of the filing fee.

This is a final appealable Order.

SO ORDERED. DATE: 6/24/16

/s/_________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Mullens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jun 24, 2016
Civil Action No. 16-1021 (D.D.C. Jun. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Smith v. Mullens

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. GRAHAM C. MULLENS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jun 24, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 16-1021 (D.D.C. Jun. 24, 2016)