From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Morton

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 1, 1974
489 F.2d 1275 (9th Cir. 1974)

Opinion

No. 72-1799.

February 1, 1974.

William W. Stevenson, Stevenson, Warden Smith, Flagstaff, Ariz., Gray, Horton Hill, Reno, Nev., for appellant.

William C. Smitherman, U.S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., John D. Helm, Kent Frizzell, Asst. Attys. Gen., Carl Strass and Dennis M. O'Connell, Attys. Lands Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court, District of Arizona.

Before WRIGHT, KILKENNY and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The decision of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in United States v. Reid Smith, sub nom., United States v. Denison, 71 I.D. 144 (1964). See also Barrows v. Hickel 447 F.2d 80, 83 (C.A.9 1971).

The consolidation of appellant's hearing with others did not affect his substantial rights.


Summaries of

Smith v. Morton

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 1, 1974
489 F.2d 1275 (9th Cir. 1974)
Case details for

Smith v. Morton

Case Details

Full title:REID SMITH, APPELLANT, v. ROGERS C. B. MORTON, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 1, 1974

Citations

489 F.2d 1275 (9th Cir. 1974)