From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Montemayor

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 9, 2015
2:13-cv-1070 AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2015)

Opinion


JOSHUA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. NOEMI MONTEMAYOR, Defendant. No. 2:13-cv-1070 AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 9, 2015

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 13, 2015, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal without prejudice of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Smith v. Montemayor

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 9, 2015
2:13-cv-1070 AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2015)
Case details for

Smith v. Montemayor

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA SMITH, Plaintiff, v. NOEMI MONTEMAYOR, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 9, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-1070 AC P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2015)