From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Hestrin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 31, 2018
No. CV 16-7097 AG (FFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 31, 2018)

Opinion

No. CV 16-7097 AG (FFM)

05-31-2018

ARTHUR D. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL A. HESTRIN (District Attorney Riv. Co.), Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: May 31, 2018

/s/_________

ANDREW J. GUILFORD

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Hestrin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 31, 2018
No. CV 16-7097 AG (FFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 31, 2018)
Case details for

Smith v. Hestrin

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR D. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL A. HESTRIN (District Attorney Riv…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 31, 2018

Citations

No. CV 16-7097 AG (FFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 31, 2018)