From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

June 4, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O'Connell, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

In opposition to the defendant's motion, the plaintiff met her burden by submitting sufficient evidence raising a triable issue of fact on the issue of whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see, Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955, 956-957; Puma v. Player, 233 A.D.2d 308; Mariaca-Olmos v. Mizrhy, 226 A.D.2d 437; Parker v. Defontaine-Stratton, 231 A.D.2d 412; Rut v. Grigonis, 214 A.D.2d 721).

Mangano, P. J., Miller, Pizzuto and Krausman, J.J., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 4, 1998
251 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Smith v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA SMITH, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN SUBURBAN BUS AUTHORITY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 4, 1998

Citations

251 A.D.2d 397 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 534

Citing Cases

Scott v. Lomonaco

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. We agree with the Supreme Court that…