From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Mendoza

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 13, 2021
19-03750 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2021)

Opinion

19-03750 BLF (PR)

08-13-2021

JASON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. J. MENDOZA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION (DOCKET NO. 54)

BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner at the Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”) in Soledad, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against CTF personnel. On July 19, 2020, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 52. On August 6, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time, seeking 45-days to file an opposition based on restrictions on programs at the prison due to the COVID-19 pandemic and awaiting discovery from Defendants. Dkt. No. 55.

Good cause appearing, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted an extension of forty-two (42) days such that his opposition is due no later than September 27, 2021.

Defendants' reply shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff's opposition is filed.

This order terminates Dkt. No. 54.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Smith v. Mendoza

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 13, 2021
19-03750 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Mendoza

Case Details

Full title:JASON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. J. MENDOZA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 13, 2021

Citations

19-03750 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2021)