From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jul 12, 1963
132 S.E.2d 78 (Ga. 1963)

Opinion

22113.

ARGUED JULY 9, 1963.

DECIDED JULY 12, 1963. REHEARING DENIED JULY 23, 1963.

Construction of decree. Glynn Superior Court. Before Judge Flexer.

Alan B. Smith, for plaintiff in error.

G. B. Cowart, contra.


The plaintiff filed a petition in the Superior Court of Glynn County against his divorced wife and prayed for a rule nisi requiring her to show cause at a time and place to be fixed by the court why a judgment or decree of that court which awarded custody of two their minor children to her with "reasonable visitation rights" in him should not be construed. An oral motion to dismiss his petition on the ground that it stated no cause of action for the relief sought was overruled and the exception is to that judgment. Held:

It is settled by the decisions in Carswell v. Shannon, 209 Ga. 596 ( 74 S.E.2d 850) and Evans v. Allen, 212 Ga. 193 ( 91 S.E.2d 518) that judgments and decrees speak for themselves and that our rules of procedure, practice and pleading in civil actions make no provision for a proceeding to construe them. This being true, the plaintiff's motion failed to state a cause of action for the relief sought and the oral motion to dismiss it for that reason should have been sustained.

Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED JULY 9, 1963 — DECIDED JULY 12, 1963 — REHEARING DENIED JULY 23, 1963.


Summaries of

Smith v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Georgia
Jul 12, 1963
132 S.E.2d 78 (Ga. 1963)
Case details for

Smith v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:SMITH v. McDANIEL

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Jul 12, 1963

Citations

132 S.E.2d 78 (Ga. 1963)
219 Ga. 208

Citing Cases

Choate v. Choate

But, the rule is well settled that "judgments and decrees speak for themselves and that our rules of…