Opinion
Civil Action 23-11067
03-14-2024
CHRISTOPHER CARSON SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CHAD E. MARKWELL, et al., Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 39) AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO TRANSFER VENUE (ECF NO. 17)
JONATHAN J.C. GREY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Pro se plaintiff Christopher Carson Smith filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit against defendants Connie D. Lester, Magen Oaks, Nathan Mikel, and others, regarding his “prisoner advance directive - do not resuscitate order.” (ECF No. 1, PageID.8-13.) This matter comes before the Court on Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti's Report and Recommendation dated February 12, 2024. (ECF No. 39.) In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny the motion to dismiss and to transfer venue filed by defendants Lester, Oaks, and Mikel (ECF No. 17). (Id.) No party has filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation.
The Court has had an opportunity to review this matter and finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. Finding no error in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Furthermore, as neither party has raised an objection to the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that the parties have waived any further objections to the Report and Recommendation. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987) (a party's failure to file any objections waives his or her right to further appeal); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
For the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated February 12, 2024 (ECF No. 39) is ADOPTED as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss and to transfer venue filed by defendants Lester, Oaks, and Mikel (ECF No. 17) is DENIED.
SO ORDERED.