From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Utah
May 13, 1996
939 P.2d 176 (Utah 1996)

Summary

stating that "Title 77, Chapter 6 does not provide for the removal of state officers"

Summary of this case from Stack v. Harms

Opinion

Nos. 960183, 960185 and 960215.

May 13, 1996.


ORDER


Case numbers 960183, 960185, and 960215 are consolidated on the court's own motion for the purpose of deciding the identical petitions for mandamus filed in each.

The petitioners request a writ of mandamus requiring Judge Lewis to accept "criminal informations" purportedly filed pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 77-6-1. This section provides for the removal of certain public officials "for high crimes and misdemeanors or malfeasance in office." However, Title 77, Chapter 6 does not authorize the commencement of criminal proceedings. Furthermore, this title and chapter authorize actions only against "a justice court judge or officer of a city, county or other political subdivision of this state." The individuals against whom petitioners filed the informations are employees of either the Utah State Tax Commission or the Utah Attorney General's office. Title 77, Chapter 6 does not provide for the removal of state officers. See Estes v. Talbot, 597 P.2d 1324, 1324-26 (Utah 1979).

For the foregoing reasons, the petitions for a writ of mandamus are denied.

This order is to be published in the official reporter of this court for the guidance of bench and bar.


Summaries of

Smith v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Utah
May 13, 1996
939 P.2d 176 (Utah 1996)

stating that "Title 77, Chapter 6 does not provide for the removal of state officers"

Summary of this case from Stack v. Harms
Case details for

Smith v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of Utah on the Relation of Thomas SMITH…

Court:Supreme Court of Utah

Date published: May 13, 1996

Citations

939 P.2d 176 (Utah 1996)

Citing Cases

Stack v. Harms

It is well settled that state officers are not subject to section 77-6-1 because it is expressly limited to…