From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Larson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 9, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-CV-12832 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 9, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-CV-12832

10-09-2014

NATHANIEL SMITH, Petitioner, v. JEFF LARSON, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, AND DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Petitioner in this matter seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He alleges he "is illegally detained and unlawfully restrained . . . as a result of the Respondent's reliance on illegal and unlawful orders of commitment that were erroneously issued by a Michigan State Circuit Court Judge." Pet. at 2. The petition itself does not reveal the reason for petitioner's incarceration, but a document attached thereto from the Michigan Department Corrections ("MDOC") indicates petitioner was sentenced on February 26, 2004, to one year and eleven months to fourteen years on an uttering and publishing charge. The same information appears on the MDOC's Offender Tracking Information System.

Because it appeared that the instant petition, which was filed on July 17, 2014, was filed long after expiration of the one-year limitations period applicable to habeas actions, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1), the Court ordered petitioner to show cause why it should not dismiss the petition as untimely. Petitioner has not responded to the Court's order, or requested additional time to respond, and the deadline for him to do so has expired. Further, nothing in the petition suggests that the limitations period may be equitably tolled.

As any appeal in this matter would be frivolous, the Court shall not issue a certificate of appealability. For the same reason, petitioner may not proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition in this matter is dismissed as untimely.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue and that petitioner may not proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.

S/ Bernard A. Friedman

BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 9, 2014

Detroit, Michigan


Summaries of

Smith v. Larson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 9, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-CV-12832 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. Larson

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL SMITH, Petitioner, v. JEFF LARSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 9, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-CV-12832 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 9, 2014)