From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Larimer Cnty. Prob. Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 31, 2014
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02449-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 31, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02449-MSK-BNB

01-31-2014

PETER GRAHAM SMITH, Plaintiff, v. LARIMER COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, Defendant.


FINAL JUDGMENT

In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.

Pursuant to the electronic ORDER of Chief Judge Marcia S. Krieger entered on January 28, 2014 ADOPTING the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 62] granting the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 38], it is

ORDERED that final judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Larimer County Probation Department and against Plaintiff Peter Graham Smith, who recovers nothing, the Complaint and this civil action are dismissed, and the case closed. It is further

ORDERED that costs are awarded to the defendant and against the plaintiff pursuant to procedures set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1, upon the filing of a bill of costs within 14 days of entry of judgment.

Dated at Denver, Colorado this 31st day of January, 2014.

FOR THE COURT:

JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK

By: ____________________

Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Smith v. Larimer Cnty. Prob. Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 31, 2014
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02449-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 31, 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. Larimer Cnty. Prob. Dep't

Case Details

Full title:PETER GRAHAM SMITH, Plaintiff, v. LARIMER COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 31, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02449-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 31, 2014)

Citing Cases

Union Collection Co. v. Buckman

Such a contract on the part of the loser to pay the amount of his losses at a gambling game could only be…

Carver v. San Joaquin Cigar Company

(Civ. Code, sec. 1614; Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1963, subd. 21.) The plaintiff was not required to show the…