From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Krammer

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
1:07-cv-01133-OWW-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)

Opinion

1:07-cv-01133-OWW-TAG (HC).

May 13, 2008


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 11) DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS: June 2, 2008


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 25, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion to for a 30-day extension of time to respond to Respondent's motion to dismiss. (Doc. 11).

Good cause having been presented to the Court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's motion for an extension of time is GRANTED;

2. Petitioner shall have to and including June 2, 2008 in which to respond to Respondent's motion to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Krammer

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 13, 2008
1:07-cv-01133-OWW-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. Krammer

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD A. SMITH, Petitioner, v. MATT KRAMMER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 13, 2008

Citations

1:07-cv-01133-OWW-TAG (HC) (E.D. Cal. May. 13, 2008)