From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Koenig

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 19, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-01650-PSG (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:19-cv-01650-PSG (AFM)

03-19-2020

JOSHUA KANE SMITH, Petitioner, v. C. KOENIG, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("R&R") recommending that the stay previously granted in this action be lifted. The Court construes Petitioner's "Notice of Withdrawal" to be objections to the R&R and has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which objections have been made.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's objections are overruled. Petitioner indicates that since the stay was granted, he has presented his unexhausted claim to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, which denied it. He also states that he "intends" to file a petition in the California Court of Appeal "within the next few days." As explained in the R&R, however, Petitioner has been cautioned more than once that he must present his claim to the California Supreme Court and that unexcused delay in doing so could result in an order vacating the stay. This action has been stayed for eight months. Notwithstanding repeated warnings and opportunities to do so, Petitioner concedes that he still has not filed a petition in the California Supreme Court. While Petitioner states that he has no legal training and limited education, these facts do not demonstrate that he acted diligently. Petitioner's objections fail to explain why he has been unable to file a petition in the California Supreme Court raising his unexhausted claim during the eight months that this action has been stayed.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted; and (2) the stay previously entered is vacated. DATED: 3/19/2020

/s/_________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Koenig

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 19, 2020
Case No. 2:19-cv-01650-PSG (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Smith v. Koenig

Case Details

Full title:JOSHUA KANE SMITH, Petitioner, v. C. KOENIG, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 19, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:19-cv-01650-PSG (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2020)

Citing Cases

Goodwin v. Madden

District courts have routinely vacated stays after much shorter delays in pursuing exhaustion in state…