From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Kleinschmidt

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 15, 2011
441 F. App'x 250 (5th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-50472

09-15-2011

EDWARD DESHAN SMITH Plaintiff — Appellant v. ANNA KLEINSCHMIDT, Pharmacist; JOHN PRITT, Pharmacist; ELIZABETH MCEWEN, Pharmacy Technician; BROOKSHIRE BROTHERS, Defendants — Appellees


Summary Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 11-CV-139

Before KING, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

The judgment of the district court dismissing with prejudice the claims of plaintiff—appellant against defendants—appellees Anna Kleinschmidt, John Pritt, Elizabeth McEwen, and Brookshire Brothers is affirmed for the reason stated in the district court's May 16, 2011 Order and Memorandum Opinion.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Kleinschmidt

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Sep 15, 2011
441 F. App'x 250 (5th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Smith v. Kleinschmidt

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD DESHAN SMITH Plaintiff-Appellant v. ANNA KLEINSCHMIDT, Pharmacist…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

441 F. App'x 250 (5th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Miller Ins. Agency v. Home Fire Etc. Ins. Co.

( Cooper v. Romney, 49 Mont. 119, 127, 141 P. 289, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 596; Holmes v. Royal Fraternal Union,…

Campbell v. Post Publishing Co.

The words in the article complained of are not susceptible of any other meaning save what shows upon the face…