From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Kim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2020
1:20-cv-00318-NONE-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2020)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00318-NONE-GSA-PC

04-03-2020

DARRELL D. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. RYAN KIM, Defendant.


ORDER WITHDRAWING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ENTERED ON MARCH 10, 2020
(ECF No. 9.) ORDER RESOLVING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
(ECF No. 2.)

Darrell D. Smith ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On March 10, 2020, the court entered findings and recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied due to Plaintiff's ability to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full. (ECF No. 8.) On April 1, 2020, Plaintiff paid the $400.00 filing fee in full. (Court docket.)

In light of the fact that Plaintiff has paid the filing fee in full, the court shall withdraw the findings and recommendations issued on March 10, 2020.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations entered on March 10, 2020, are WITHDRAWN; and
2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, filed on March 2, 2020, is RESOLVED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 3 , 2020

/s/ Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Kim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 3, 2020
1:20-cv-00318-NONE-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Smith v. Kim

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL D. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. RYAN KIM, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 3, 2020

Citations

1:20-cv-00318-NONE-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 3, 2020)