From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Kendryna

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:20-cv-2417 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-2417 JAM KJN P

06-01-2021

TAVARIUS SMITH, Plaintiff, v. KENDRYNA, Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 15, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 15, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.


Summaries of

Smith v. Kendryna

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 1, 2021
2:20-cv-2417 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Kendryna

Case Details

Full title:TAVARIUS SMITH, Plaintiff, v. KENDRYNA, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-2417 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2021)