From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 2, 2014
No. 3:14-CV-2402-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2014)

Opinion

No. 3:14-CV-2402-M-BN

12-02-2014

MICHAEL D. SMITH and MARGUERITE SMITH, Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and MATTHEW TRAN, Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case on November 3, 2014. See Dkt. No. 25. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Dienbao Tran is DISMISSED from this lawsuit because he was improperly joined, Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion to Remand [Dkt. No. 10] is DENIED, and Defendant Tran's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 7] is DENIED AS MOOT.

Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 6] is granted in part and denied in part as follows: (1) JPMC's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Plaintiffs' claim for breach of contract on the original mortgage loan and Plaintiffs' common-law unreasonable collection tort claim and Texas Debt Collection Practices Act claims based on JPMC's collection efforts allegedly made with the intent to abuse or harass Plaintiffs; (2) JPMC's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Plaintiffs' claims for breach of contract on the lock-in agreement, and estoppel and waiver, and (3) JPMC's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE as to Plaintiffs' claims for conversion, violations of the Texas Debt Collection Practices Act based on JPMC's allegedly making false or misleading statements, violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and negligence.

Plaintiffs have twenty-one days to replead the claims dismissed without prejudice. If Plaintiffs do not replead, the case will be dismissed with prejudice without further notice.

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2014.

/s/_________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Smith v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 2, 2014
No. 3:14-CV-2402-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL D. SMITH and MARGUERITE SMITH, Plaintiffs, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 2, 2014

Citations

No. 3:14-CV-2402-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Dec. 2, 2014)

Citing Cases

Guerra v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Any claim for "unlawful debt collection" is most likely a claim for violation of the TDCA, as "[t]he TDCA is…

Daniels v. Regions Bank

Regarding Plaintiff's DTPA tie-in claim, it fails because Plaintiff's TDCPA claim fails and because Plaintiff…