From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Jones

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 30, 2022
3:20-CV-00504-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 30, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-CV-00504-MMD-CLB

08-30-2022

WILLIE T. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. DAWN JONES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On July 6, 2022, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 62). Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9 Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9

Cir. 1998). (ECF No. 66). Plaintiff failed to timely oppose the motion. However, the Court sua sponte granted Plaintiff an extension of time to August 29, 2022 to file an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 70). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition.

The Court will again sua sponte grant plaintiff one final extension of time to Friday, September 30, 2022 to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the Court for decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Smith v. Jones

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 30, 2022
3:20-CV-00504-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE T. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. DAWN JONES, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 30, 2022

Citations

3:20-CV-00504-MMD-CLB (D. Nev. Aug. 30, 2022)