From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Howez

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 30, 2021
Civil Action 05-CV-73868-DT (E.D. Mich. Jun. 30, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 05-CV-73868-DT

06-30-2021

DERRICK LEE SMITH, Petitioner, v. CAROL HOWES, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S REQUEST TO REOPEN

Denise Page Hood, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Petitioner's motion to reopen this habeas case due to what he believes is a new retroactively-applicable rule of law as set forth in Michigan Court Rule 6.108 and based upon Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314 (1987). The Court dismissed Petitioner's original habeas petition on exhaustion grounds in 2005, and denied reconsideration and several post-judgment motions in 2006. Petitioner filed the instant motion on June 17, 2021.

Having reviewed Petitioner's motion, the Court finds no reason to reopen this long-closed case. The case was dismissed without prejudice in 2005 and the Court did not retain jurisdiction over the matter. Should Petitioner wish to proceed on new habeas claims, must file a new habeas petition in a new case. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Petitioner's motion. (ECF No. 9) This case remains closed. No further pleadings should be filed in this matter. Additional pleadings may be stricken.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Howez

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 30, 2021
Civil Action 05-CV-73868-DT (E.D. Mich. Jun. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Howez

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK LEE SMITH, Petitioner, v. CAROL HOWES, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 05-CV-73868-DT (E.D. Mich. Jun. 30, 2021)