From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Howell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 12, 2023
2:20-cv-01108-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01108-CDS-DJA

04-12-2023

CHRISTOPHER O. SMITH, Petitioner v. JERRY HOWELL, et al., Respondents


ORDER STRIKING FUGITIVE DOCUMENT [ECF No. 80]

This is a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 counseled habeas corpus petition. Despite being represented by counsel, petitioner Christopher Smith filed a pro se request for judicial notice, asking “this court to compel [his] Federal Appellate attorney to . . . supplement [his] writ.” ECF No. 80. Once an attorney has made an appearance on behalf of a party, the party may not personally file any document with the court. LR IA 11-6. Smith's filing is a fugitive document not properly before the court.

It is therefore ordered that petitioner's pro se request for judicial notice [ECF No. 80] shall be stricken as a fugitive document.


Summaries of

Smith v. Howell

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 12, 2023
2:20-cv-01108-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Howell

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER O. SMITH, Petitioner v. JERRY HOWELL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 12, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-01108-CDS-DJA (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2023)