From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Howard

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Nov 13, 2014
NUMBER 13-14-00562-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2014)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-14-00562-CV

11-13-2014

DEREK SMITH, Appellant, v. JANET DENISE HOWARD, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Derek Smith, appealed a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas. On October 20, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $195.00 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $195.00 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 13th day of November, 2014.


Summaries of

Smith v. Howard

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Nov 13, 2014
NUMBER 13-14-00562-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Smith v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:DEREK SMITH, Appellant, v. JANET DENISE HOWARD, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Nov 13, 2014

Citations

NUMBER 13-14-00562-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 13, 2014)