From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Hosford

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Jul 13, 2010
CASE NO. 4: 10-cv-00061-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Jul. 13, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4: 10-cv-00061-MP-WCS.

July 13, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Report and Recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 7. In an order filed April 26, 2010, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint by May 24, 2010. Though Plaintiff was specifically warned that failure to comply could lead to the dismissal of his case, he did not file the amended complaint. Then, in a June 9, 2010 order, the Magistrate Judge recommended the case be dismissed, affording Plaintiff another fourteen (14) days to correct his deficiencies. Plaintiff has not responded, and the time for doing so has now passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 7, is ADOPTED and incorporated herein.
2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Hosford

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Jul 13, 2010
CASE NO. 4: 10-cv-00061-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Jul. 13, 2010)
Case details for

Smith v. Hosford

Case Details

Full title:RANDY DEAN SMITH, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH HOSFORD, EILEEN A HUMPHREY, PETE…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division

Date published: Jul 13, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 4: 10-cv-00061-MP-WCS (N.D. Fla. Jul. 13, 2010)

Citing Cases

Hudson Properties, Inc. v. City of Westwood

MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — Refusal to Grant Building Permit — Validity of Ordinance. An ordinance that puts it…

Schulte v. City of Garnett

"The ordinance does not prohibit the use of the plaintiff's lot for storing oil and gasoline; it regulates…