From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Hopper

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Mar 11, 2022
No. 13-21-00307-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2022)

Opinion

13-21-00307-CV

03-11-2022

LILLIAN E. SMITH, Appellant, v. CRAIG HOPPER, AS PERMANENT GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE OF MARGARET VIRGINIA LANDGREBE, Appellee.


On appeal from the County Court of Gonzales County, Texas.

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LETICIA HINOJOSA JUSTICE

This matter is before the Court on an agreed motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal and expedite issuance of mandate. The parties jointly requested the dismissal and expedited issuance of the mandate, as they have entered a settlement agreement resolving this dispute.

The Court, having considered the agreed motion, is of the opinion that the agreed motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the agreed motion to dismiss and expedite issuance of mandate is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed.

In accordance with the joint motion and agreement of the parties, costs will be taxed against the party incurring the same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). Because the appeal is dismissed at parties' request, no motion for rehearing shall be entertained. Finally, for good cause, and in accordance with the party's agreement to issue the mandate within ten days of the appeal being dismissed, the Clerk of the Court shall issue the mandate instanter. See Tex. R. App. P. 18.1(c).


Summaries of

Smith v. Hopper

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Mar 11, 2022
No. 13-21-00307-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Hopper

Case Details

Full title:LILLIAN E. SMITH, Appellant, v. CRAIG HOPPER, AS PERMANENT GUARDIAN OF THE…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: Mar 11, 2022

Citations

No. 13-21-00307-CV (Tex. App. Mar. 11, 2022)