From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Harry

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 1, 2023
Civil Action 1:19-CV-362 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:19-CV-362

03-01-2023

STEWART SMITH, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondents


ORDER

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2023, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and in accordance with the court's memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
3. Petitioner's motion (Doc. 30) for discovery is DISMISSED as moot.
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).


Summaries of

Smith v. Harry

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Mar 1, 2023
Civil Action 1:19-CV-362 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Harry

Case Details

Full title:STEWART SMITH, Petitioner v. SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, PA STATE…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 1, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 1:19-CV-362 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 1, 2023)