From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Hardy

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Apr 8, 2009
No. C06-5455-RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Apr. 8, 2009)

Opinion

No. C06-5455-RBL/KLS.

April 8, 2009


ORDER GRANTING COSTS ON APPEAL


This matter has been remanded and re-referred to the undersigned following reversal of this Court's Order (Dkt. # 42) granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants on all of Plaintiff Scott C. Smith's claims. Dkts. # 50 and 51. On remand, the Ninth Circuit directed this Court to address qualified immunity and Plaintiff's third claim for failure to supervise and train in light of its summary disposition. Dkt. # 50.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Scott C. Smith's Bill of Costs. Dkt. # 53. Mr. Smith seeks to recover the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filing fee applicable to his appeal of the District Court's summary judgment order. Id. On August 13, 2007, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted Mr. Smith leave to proceed in forma pauperis in his appeal and directed the appropriate prison officials to assess, collect and forward to the District Court the filing and docketing fees for the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). Dkt. # 49.

Mr. Smith filed his Bill of Costs on February 13, 2009. Id. The Ninth Circuit filed its mandate on February 6, 2009. Dkt. # 51. Defendants have filed no opposition to Mr. Smith's Bill of Costs.

Mr. Smith states that partial payment of the $455.00 filing fee has been made from his prison account and the remainder is considered a lien against his prison account. Dkt. # 53, p. 1. A review of amounts received from Mr. Smith's prison account reflects that filing fees of $350.00 each, remain owing in Mr. Smiths' District Court Case Nos. 06-5455, 06-5712 and 07-5108. To date, the amount of $304.98 has been deducted from his prison account and applied toward these filing fees. Mr. Smith's prison account will continue to be deducted for these fees. No deductions have been applied toward payment of the appellate filing fee.

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39(e)(4), the fee for filing the notice of appeal is taxable in the district court for the benefit of the party entitled to costs under the rule. Accordingly, Mr. Smith's Bill of Costs (Dkt. # 53) is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) The $455.00 filing fee is taxed against Defendants; Defendants shall pay the $455.00 filing fee to the District Court Clerk.
(2) The Clerk of Court shall serve this Order on the Attorney General for the State of Washington, P.O. Box 40116, Olympia, Washington 98504-0116, Attn: Criminal Justice Division, who shall notify the appropriate agency or prison authority responsible for calculating, collecting and forwarding the monthly payments from Mr. Smith's account, to cancel the collection of any said monthly payments from Mr. Smith's account for the collection of the appeal fee in Scott C. Smith v. Caroline Hardy, et al., Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Docket No. 07-35430. (This Order discontinues the Order of the Court of Appeals set forth at Dkt. # 49).
(3) The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to counsel for Defendants.


Summaries of

Smith v. Hardy

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Apr 8, 2009
No. C06-5455-RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Apr. 8, 2009)
Case details for

Smith v. Hardy

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT C. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CAROLINE HARDY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Apr 8, 2009

Citations

No. C06-5455-RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. Apr. 8, 2009)