From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Haden

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 21, 1995
69 F.3d 606 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

Opinion

Nos. 95-7014 95-7033.

Decided November 21, 1995.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; HENDERSON and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT

This case was heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. Upon consideration thereof, it is

Ordered that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion of December 23, 1994. See Smith v. Haden, 872 F. Supp. 1040 (D.D.C. 1994). The cross-appeal is therefore moot.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 41(a)(1).


Summaries of

Smith v. Haden

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 21, 1995
69 F.3d 606 (D.C. Cir. 1995)
Case details for

Smith v. Haden

Case Details

Full title:LINDA A. SMITH APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE v. MABEL D. HADEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Nov 21, 1995

Citations

69 F.3d 606 (D.C. Cir. 1995)

Citing Cases

Kituskie v. Corbman

A review of case law in the Commonwealth shows that the issue of whether collectibility of damages in an…

Yeager v. Nat'l Pub. Radio

Insofar as plaintiff may insinuate legal malpractice committed by NPR's attorneys, he has failed to state a…