From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Greene

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 24, 2008
9:06-CV-505, (LEK/GJD) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2008)

Opinion

9:06-CV-505, (LEK/GJD).

March 24, 2008


DECISION AND ORDER


This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on December, 26, 2007, by the Honorable Gustave J. DiBianco, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(c) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 32).

Within ten days, excluding weekends and holidays, after a party has been served with a copy of a Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation, the party "may serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations," FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), in compliance with L.R. 72.1. No objections have been raised in the allotted time with respect to Judge DiBianco's Report-Recommendation. Furthermore, after examining the record, the Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 32) is APPROVED and ADOPTED with respect to its final determinations of Defendants; and it is further

ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED with respect to Defendants Levine and Kelly; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 22) is DENIED as to Defendant Greene; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Greene

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Mar 24, 2008
9:06-CV-505, (LEK/GJD) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Smith v. Greene

Case Details

Full title:JULIO ISLEY SMITH, Plaintiff, v. GARY GREENE, Superintendent, et. al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Mar 24, 2008

Citations

9:06-CV-505, (LEK/GJD) (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 24, 2008)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Rynkewicz

Graham v. Henderson, 89 F.3d 75, 79 (2d Cir.1996); See Gill v. Pidlypchak, 389 F.3d 379, 380 (2d Cir. 2004)…