From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Graham

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 14, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-14

In the Matter of James SMITH, Petitioner, v. Harold D. GRAHAM, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County [Thomas G. Leone, A.J.], entered September 11, 2012) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier II hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule. James Smith, Petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Andrew B. Ayers of Counsel), for Respondent.


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County [Thomas G. Leone, A.J.], entered September 11, 2012) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier II hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.
James Smith, Petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Andrew B. Ayers of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Graham

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 14, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Smith v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of James SMITH, Petitioner, v. Harold D. GRAHAM…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 14, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 1590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4512
967 N.Y.S.2d 863