From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 17, 2003
307 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

93206

Decided and Entered: July 17, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Warren Smith, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit an inmate from participating in a demonstration, disobeying a direct order and violating movement regulations. The charges stem from an incident in the mess hall where 52 inmates stopped working, sat in the mess hall and refused an order to return to work. Notwithstanding the number of inmates involved in the incident, we reject petitioner's assertion that the misbehavior report was insufficient. The misbehavior report identified petitioner by name and indicated his participation in the demonstration, as well as his failure to return to work (see 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [c] [4]; see also Matter of Witherspoon v. Goord, 284 A.D.2d 681). The misbehavior report and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966;Matter of Bernier v. Mann, 166 A.D.2d 798). Although petitioner requested on his assistant form that he wanted to view a videotape of the incident, he did not request the videotape during the hearing until after the disposition had been read. Under these circumstances, we find that petitioner was not denied the right to present evidence (see Matter of Hodge v. Goord, 280 A.D.2d 767). Finally, petitioner has demonstrated no prejudice resulting from any alleged inadequate employee assistance (see Matter of Johnson v. Coombe, 228 A.D.2d 755).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Rose, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Smith v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 17, 2003
307 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Smith v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WARREN SMITH, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 17, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 298

Citing Cases

Jamison v. Fischer

The record also reflects that the hearing was commenced and completed in a timely manner and the proper…

In the Matter of Schuler v. McCray

The determination of guilt was upheld on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.…