From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Gipson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 3, 2011
No. C 11-2147 RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-2147 RS (PR)

10-03-2011

JAMES SMITH, aka RASHEED, Petitioner, v. C. GIPSON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This is a federal habeas corpus action filed by a pro se state prisoner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petition is DISMISSED under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute because petitioner has failed to file an amended petition by the deadline. The document he has submitted (Docket No. 10) fails to address the questions raised in the Court's order dismissing the petition with leave to amend (Docket No. 9), and also does not constitute an amended petition. The Clerk shall terminate Docket No. 10, enter judgment in favor of respondent, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Gipson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 3, 2011
No. C 11-2147 RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Smith v. Gipson

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SMITH, aka RASHEED, Petitioner, v. C. GIPSON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 3, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-2147 RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2011)