From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Gibson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 24, 2012
Civil Case No. 10-cv-02559-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 10-cv-02559-REB-KLM

08-24-2012

NICKY L. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CPT. SCOTT GIBSON, Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#56] filed July 18, 2012. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted.

"[#56]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122. In addition, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed his pleadings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)).
--------

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#56] filed July 18, 2012, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment [#36] filed October 31, 2011, is GRANTED;

3. That plaintiff's claims against defendant are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

4. That judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant Cpt. Scott Gibson against plaintiff Nicky L. Smith on all claims for relief and causes of action; provided, that the judgment shall be with prejudice; and

5. That defendant is AWARDED his costs to be taxed by the clerk of the court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.

Dated August 24, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

____________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Smith v. Gibson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 24, 2012
Civil Case No. 10-cv-02559-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Gibson

Case Details

Full title:NICKY L. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. CPT. SCOTT GIBSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 24, 2012

Citations

Civil Case No. 10-cv-02559-REB-KLM (D. Colo. Aug. 24, 2012)