From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Gant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 4, 2015
Case No. CV 12-7207 DDP (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2015)

Summary

rejecting failure to protect claim based on verbal harassment from other prisoners

Summary of this case from Adams v. Landry

Opinion

Case No. CV 12-7207 DDP (JCG)

09-04-2015

ROBERT G. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. GANT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"), the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Plaintiff's Objections generally reiterate the arguments made in the SAC, and lack merit for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on the parties. DATED: September 4, 2015

/s/_________

HON. DEAN D. PREGERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Gant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 4, 2015
Case No. CV 12-7207 DDP (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2015)

rejecting failure to protect claim based on verbal harassment from other prisoners

Summary of this case from Adams v. Landry
Case details for

Smith v. Gant

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT G. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. GANT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 4, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 12-7207 DDP (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 4, 2015)

Citing Cases

Adams v. Landry

While he might have subjectively interpreted the name calling and other comments as "challenges,"…