From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SMITH v. FRAC TECH SERVICES, LTD.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Sep 2, 2010
No. 4:09CV00679 JLH (E.D. Ark. Sep. 2, 2010)

Opinion

No. 4:09CV00679 JLH.

September 2, 2010


ORDER


The plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a fifth amended and substituted complaint is GRANTED. Document #196. Plaintiffs must file their fifth amended and substituted complaint within seven days from the entry of this order. Plaintiffs will delete paragraph 67 before filing the fifth amended and substituted complaint.

The motion for leave to amend is construed as a motion to dismiss without prejudice the following plaintiffs: Lincoln Sheedy, Brad Morton, James Fay, Adam Davenport, Chad Hardin, Taylor Oram, Jose Herrera, and Robert Holguin. The motion is granted, and the claims of those persons are dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

SMITH v. FRAC TECH SERVICES, LTD.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Sep 2, 2010
No. 4:09CV00679 JLH (E.D. Ark. Sep. 2, 2010)
Case details for

SMITH v. FRAC TECH SERVICES, LTD.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SMITH, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. FRAC TECH SERVICES, LTD. DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Sep 2, 2010

Citations

No. 4:09CV00679 JLH (E.D. Ark. Sep. 2, 2010)

Citing Cases

Williams Dev. & Constr., Inc. v. United States

Generally, a party to a lawsuit does not have standing to seek to quash a subpoena directed to a…

Cave v. Levy

Ordinarily a party has no standing to move to quash a subpoena to a non-party. Smith v. Frac Tech Servs.,…