From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Ford

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 22, 2022
3:20-CV-00501-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Dec. 22, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-CV-00501-ART-CLB

12-22-2022

WILLIE T. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AARON FORD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

On November 28, 2022, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 67). Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998). (ECF No. 70). Plaintiff was required to file an opposition to the motion by on or before Tuesday, December 20, 2022. (ECF No. 70). To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or otherwise responded to the motion.

Therefore, the Court sua sponte grants Plaintiff an extension of time to Friday, January 20, 2023 to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time shall be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the Court for decision.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Ford

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 22, 2022
3:20-CV-00501-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Dec. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Smith v. Ford

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE T. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. AARON FORD, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 22, 2022

Citations

3:20-CV-00501-ART-CLB (D. Nev. Dec. 22, 2022)