From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Flud

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 11, 2024
4:22-cv-00207-KGB (E.D. Ark. Mar. 11, 2024)

Opinion

4:22-cv-00207-KGB

03-11-2024

CLARENCE SMITH PLAINTIFF v. KRISTIE FLUD, et al. DEFENDANT


ORDER

KRISTINE G. BAKER CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is the Proposed Findings and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris (Dkt. No. 47). No objections have been filed, and the deadline to file objections has passed. Judge Harris recommends that plaintiff Clarence Smith's complaint be dismissed for failure to prosecute (Id., at 2). After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects.

The Court dismisses without prejudice this case and certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Smith v. Flud

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 11, 2024
4:22-cv-00207-KGB (E.D. Ark. Mar. 11, 2024)
Case details for

Smith v. Flud

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE SMITH PLAINTIFF v. KRISTIE FLUD, et al. DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 11, 2024

Citations

4:22-cv-00207-KGB (E.D. Ark. Mar. 11, 2024)