From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 31, 2021
313 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-1290

03-31-2021

Carlton SMITH, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

Carlton Smith, pro se, Appellant. Lance Neff, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Carlton Smith, pro se, Appellant.

Lance Neff, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

AFFIRMED . See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236, 1246 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that dismissal of habeas corpus petitions, rather than transfer, is appropriate where the petitioner is seeking relief that "(1) would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850, (2) raise claims that could have been raised at trial or, if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence, or (3) would be considered a second or successive motion under rule 3.850 that either fails to allege new or different grounds for relief that were known or should have been known at the time the first motion was filed.").

Lewis, Makar, and Long, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Smith v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 31, 2021
313 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:CARLTON SMITH, Appellant, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 31, 2021

Citations

313 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)