From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Fisher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 15, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6018 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6018

02-15-2012

GEORGE SMITH [#FD-2316], Petitioner, v. JON FISHER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this __ day of ___________ 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the response, and Petitioner's reply to the response, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

3. a certificate of appealability shall not issue, in that the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that a reasonable jurist would debate the correctness of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,484 (2000); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.


Summaries of

Smith v. Fisher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 15, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6018 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Smith v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE SMITH [#FD-2316], Petitioner, v. JON FISHER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 15, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6018 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 2012)