Opinion
Submitted April 5, 1993
Decided July 9, 1993
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the order of Supreme Court denying defendant's motion for an in camera interview of his child, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.