From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Fields

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1927
137 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1927)

Opinion

(Filed 6 April, 1927.)

APPEAL by defendants from Lyon, Emergency Judge, at October Term, 1926, of ORANGE.

A. H. Graham and Gattis Gattis for plaintiff.

A. C. Ray for defendants.


Civil action to recover balance alleged to be due the plaintiff under a contract for sawing and hauling lumber for the defendants.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff, the defendants appeal, assigning errors.


The defendants in limine lodged a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. It is alleged that the information, which defendants consider vital and important to their case, came to their attention after the adjournment of the term of court at which the case was tried, and after the appeal was docketed here. Allen v. Gooding, 174 N.C. 271. The showing made in this respect seems to meet the requirements laid down in Johnson v. R. R., 163 N.C. p. 453, for the granting of new trials on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Upon this ground the cause will be remanded for another hearing.

New trial.


Summaries of

Smith v. Fields

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 1927
137 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1927)
Case details for

Smith v. Fields

Case Details

Full title:O. R. SMITH v. W. G. FIELDS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 1927

Citations

137 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1927)
137 S.E. 926