From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Ferrell

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Feb 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION 09-00466-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Feb. 18, 2010)

Summary

dismissing action because claims were duplicative of those in another pending action

Summary of this case from Mesa v. Pa. Higher Educ. Assistance

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 09-00466-CG-B.

February 18, 2010


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as duplicative.


Summaries of

Smith v. Ferrell

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Feb 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION 09-00466-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Feb. 18, 2010)

dismissing action because claims were duplicative of those in another pending action

Summary of this case from Mesa v. Pa. Higher Educ. Assistance
Case details for

Smith v. Ferrell

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY SMITH, JR., #207658, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN JERRY FERRELL, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 18, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 09-00466-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Feb. 18, 2010)

Citing Cases

Mesa v. Pa. Higher Educ. Assistance

Duplicative actions are subject to dismissal under §1915(e)(i) as malicious. See Bailey, 846 F.2d at 1021…

Beaudion v. Monroe Cnty. Det. Ctr.

Numerous federal courts have held that duplicative cases were frivolous or malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§…