Smith v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc. (In re FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.)

Full title: In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

Date published: May 1, 2017

Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM (N.D. Ind. May. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM MDL 1700

05-01-2017

In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Arthur Smith, et al. v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Civil No. 3:05cv600 RLM-MGG (TN)

Robert L. Miller, Jr. Judge United States District Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Twenty proposed class actions in this multi-district litigation docket came before me on March 13-14 for fairness hearings. The cases are on limited remand from the court of appeals, where nineteen of them awaited resolution. The Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation centralized the cases under 28 U.S.C. § 1407, but the cases haven't been consolidated, so each proposed settlement must be examined separately.

I. HISTORY OF THE MDL DOCKET

In July 2005, the JPMDL granted (over the plaintiffs' objections) FedEx Ground's second request to centralize a series of cases in which FedEx Ground drivers claimed to be employees, rather than the independent contractors their employment contracts announced. The Panel reasoned that economies were to be gained because all drivers were governed by the same contract. The MDL process proved cumbersome. Even if the wording of each contract was the same, each state's agency law varied, and differences in operation from one terminal to the next had the potential of affecting the decision.

The number of cases in the MDL docket eventually grew to 40. I appointed attorneys from three law firms to serve as co-lead counsel: Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P. of Minneapolis, Harwood Feffer LLP of New York City, and Leonard Carder LLP of Oakland. I also appointed attorneys from three other firms - Cureton Caplan, P.C. of Delran, NJ; Siegel, Brill, Greupner, Duffy & Foster, P.A. of Minneapolis; and Zimmerman Reed P.L.L.P. of Minneapolis - to complete the plaintiffs' steering committee.

The stakes were enormous. Not only did the plaintiffs' co-lead counsel seek to represent upwards of 10,000 arguably under-compensated drivers, but the attack on drivers' independent contractor status threatened FedEx Ground's entire business model.

Consistent with those stakes, discovery was more than extensive. Although damages discovery was deferred, merits discovery and class discovery were conducted simultaneously. Some 3.2 million documents were produced and analyzed; seventeen sets of interrogatories were answered; 215 named plaintiffs answered fifteen requests for admission and sat for depositions; 105 FedEx Ground personnel sat for daylong depositions; 20 expert witnesses produced reports and sat for daylong depositions; Daubert motions were filed and defended. The class representatives were heavily involved in tracking down records and documents, as well as in preparing for, and giving, their own depositions.

The plaintiffs filed class certification motions in each of the cases; FedEx Ground opposed each motion. The plaintiffs filed an omnibus fact memorandum supported by 65 bankers' boxes of documents. In 2007 and 2008, I certified classes in 26 of the then-40 cases, and in all of the 20 on limited remand from the court of appeals. FedEx Ground sought interlocutory appellate review of the certification grants, and the plaintiffs successfully opposed that effort. Class notifications were hampered by spotty databases.

Sixty summary judgment motions and briefing followed. The drivers filed a 75-page statement of undisputed material facts with citations to 12 volumes. In 2010 and 2011, I denied a few of FedEx Ground's summary judgment motions but granted most, and granted all in the 20 cases now on limited remand. With respect to some of the cases, I suggested remand and the Panel sent the cases back to the transferor courts. Co-lead counsel appealed the summary judgment grants in these 20 cases to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; in most of those cases, FedEx Ground cross-appealed the class certifications. In both this court and the court of appeals, the parties recommended that the Kansas Craig case be addressed first, as something of a quasi-bellwether case. After briefing and argument, the court of appeals certified the employee/independent contractor case to the Kansas Supreme Court, which devised a new 18-part test and answered the certified question in the drivers' favor. Craig v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., 335 P.3d 66 (Kan. 2014). The court of appeals ultimately reversed my grant of summary judgment to FedEx Ground in Craig, and remanded the case. In re FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc. Emp't Practices Litig., 792 F.3d 818 (7th Cir. 2015). In addition to the reversal in the Kansas case, rulings in other courts were trending toward findings of employee status, see Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., 765 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2014) (California law); Slayman v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., 765 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2015) (Oregon law), or at least toward fact issues for trial. See Gray v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., 799 F.3d 995 (8th Cir. 2015) (Missouri law); Carlson v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., 787 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2015) (Florida law).

The parties didn't immediately ask me to find for the Kansas drivers on liability and suggest remand to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. Instead, the parties had chosen a mediator in an effort to resolve all of the cases remaining in the Seventh Circuit.

Each case was mediated separately, with some cases requiring several sessions. Each case was mediated with an eye on the governing law, which varied from case to case. The mediation spanned four weeks. The drivers and FedEx Ground exchanged experts' views as to the maximum recovery for each case if the drivers prevailed across the board. Settlements were reached in each case, and the court granted preliminary approval of each of the settlements. The plaintiffs then retained Rust Consulting to administer the settlements.

I conducted fairness hearings on March 13 and 14, 2017, and on March 15 and 16, I notified the court of appeals of my inclination to enter final approval of the class settlements. The court of appeals entered a second limited remand order on March 22 to allow me to do so.

II. FAIRNESS OF THE SETTLEMENT

Parties can't settle class actions without the court finding that the proposed settlement is "fair, reasonable, and adequate." Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e); Synfuel Technologies, Inc. v. DHL Express (USA), Inc., 463 F.3d 646, 652 (7th Cir. 2006); see also EEOC v. Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc., 768 F.2d 884, 889 (7th Cir. 1985) ("The district court may not deny approval of a consent decree unless it is unfair, unreasonable, or inadequate."). In that effort, we in this circuit consider several circumstantial factors:

(1) the strength of the case for plaintiffs on the merits, balanced against the extent of settlement offer; (2) the complexity, length, and expense of further litigation; (3) the amount of opposition to the settlement; (4) the reaction of members of the class to the settlement; (5) the opinion of competent counsel; and (6) stage of the proceedings and the amount of discovery completed.

Wong v. Accretive Health, Inc., 773 F.3d 859, 863 (7th Cir. 2014) (quoting Gautreaux v. Pierce, 690 F.2d 616, 631 (7th Cir. 1982)). Of those, the first is the most important. Martin v. Reid, 818 F.3d 302, 306 (7th Cir. 2016).

The Smith case was filed in June 2005 in the Western District of Tennessee, and was first centralized in this court under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 in August 2005. I granted the plaintiffs' motion for certification of an 812-member class in March 2008 and again in February 2010, and granted summary judgment to FedEx Ground in December 2010, finding that the plaintiffs were independent contractors under Tennessee law. The class appealed.

In June 2016, the parties reached a proposed settlement. FedEx Ground would pay $12,250,000 to the plaintiffs. For each workweek of 35 or more hours during the class period, each class member would receive $40.25; for each workweek of 16-35 hours, each class member would receive $14.09. No class member would receive less than a $250 lump sum. The average recovery per class member would be $10,863, with the highest share being $39,838. No plaintiff would be required to fill out, or collect the information needed for, a claim form. No part of the settlement fund would revert to FedEx Ground if anything were left over.

The proposed settlement resulted from arms-length negotiations with a private mediator. Each side took stock of potential liability and damages under Tennessee law. The class consulted an expert in accounting and damages, who concluded that the maximum recovery the plaintiffs could achieve would be $20,587,000 without interest. The proposed settlement amounts to about 57 percent of a perfect outcome.

A perfect outcome would be a long way off. At this point, my ruling that these drivers are independent contractors under Tennessee law is the only judicial determination. The class would need for the court of appeals to find my ruling to have been in error; such an appellate ruling might consist only of a determination that Tennessee drivers might be employees, but a trial is needed. Such a ruling would be followed by a likely FedEx Ground motion to decertify the class (seeking to exclude drivers who hired others to handle routes and arguing that "full time" drivers would be too difficult to identify), a remand to the district court in Tennessee, and a need to overcome defenses FedEx Ground didn't need to raise at the summary judgment stage. They faced some potentially unfavorable law that rescission isn't available if the parties can't be restored to the status quo, and the statute of limitations in the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, and an open question as to whether a business entity has a right of action under that statute. If the plaintiffs prevailed at trial, FedEx Ground would likely appeal. Before the settlement, then, the class needed to string together victories in many skirmishes, beginning with a reversal in the court of appeals. The position of an appellant is not one of strength. And receipt of any money by any plaintiffs would be a long time off, well beyond the eleven years already invested in this litigation.

The plan for giving notice of the proposed settlement, and the third party administrator's execution of the plan, are detailed thoroughly in the papers supporting the plaintiffs' motions, and comply with the preliminary approval order, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), and 28 U.S.C. § 1715.

One class member has objected to the proposed settlement. Mr. Kevin Patterson objected on these grounds: (1) the settlement doesn't produce a 100 percent compensation for fuel and insurances expenses; (2) the settlement doesn't give the Tennessee drivers the same amount of recovery as the California drivers got; (3) the attorney fees should be paid by FedEx Ground rather than by the class members; and (4) the requested service fee awards for the named plaintiffs is too high. Mr. Patterson also asks how the class representatives were selected.

Mr. Patterson's first two observations are right, but they don't amount to a persuasive objection. Settlements come from compromise; no defendant would ever settle if the settlement had to fully compensate the plaintiff. There is authority that such an argument shouldn't even be considered an objection. In re Capital One Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litig., 80 F. Supp. 3d 781, 790 (N.D. Ill. 2015). Co-lead counsel's affidavit in support of the settlement explains the risks and delays the class would face if it held out for full recovery and, apart from generally noting that he's not being fully compensated, Mr. Patterson offers nothing by which to questions the attorneys' reasoning. Mr. Patterson is also right that the California drivers saw a better outcome, but Tennessee law doesn't provide as good an outcome as California law.

I will address Mr. Patterson's objections concerning attorney fees and service awards when I reach those topics.

Every settlement is a compromise, but this settlement achieves a good percentage of what the plaintiffs might have won had the case ever reached trial. In the absence of settlement, the best case scenario for the class is probably complex, would very likely take many more years, and is certain to be expensive - perhaps more than what has been incurred to get to this point. There is minimal opposition or objection. There is no indication or suggestion of collusion. Based on all of this, I find that the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate.

III. ATTORNEY FEES

Plaintiffs' co-lead counsel seek an award of attorney fees of $3,675,000 from the settlement amount. Our court of appeals favors the percentage-of-the-fund fee in common fund cases because it provides the best hope of estimating what a willing seller and a willing buyer seeking the largest recovery in the shortest time would have agreed to ex ante. See In re Synthroid Marketing Litig., 325 F.3d 974, 979-980 (7th Cir. 2003). As co-lead counsel calculate, that would be 30 percent of the $12,250,000 settlement fund. As I understand the law of this circuit, I must take another step or two before I can determine attorney fees.

In Redman v. RadioShack Corp., 768 F.3d 622, 630 (7th Cir. 2014), the court of appeals explained that if we simply divide the gross settlement figure by the attorney fee request, we saddle the class members with the costs of administration, which benefit the attorneys as well as the class members. Accordingly, the court explained, "[t]he ratio that is relevant to assessing the reasonableness of the attorneys' fee that the parties agreed to is the ratio of (1) the fee to (2) the fee plus what the class members received." Id.

In their memorandum in support of their motion for final approval, co-lead counsel expect the $12,250,000 class settlement fund to be allocated and distributed this way: about $8,277,500 to the class; $3,675,000 (if I award what counsel seek) for attorney's fees and costs; $100,000 to the third-party administrator for settlement administration; $15,000 (if I award what counsel seek) in service fees for each of the 5 named class representatives who sat for depositions in this action; and about $122,500 (1 percent of the settlement) for a reserve fund for later payments to any self-identified class members.

The affidavit of the third-party administrator's representative in support of the motion estimates only about $64,090 is needed for settlement administration [Doc. No. 2947]. The exhibit attached to the settlement agreement itself estimates only about $53,271 for settlement administration [Doc. No. 2669-8]. I will base the amount withheld for administrative costs on the third-party administrator's estimates, and will authorize payment up to $75,000 for the cost of settlement administration, to provide an adequate buffer for any additional costs that may be incurred. The service fees and the reserve fund would go to class members, so the total going to class members plus the requested attorney fees (and costs) would be $12,175,000. A 30 percent fee, as calculated in accordance with Redman v. RadioShack, would be $3,652,500.

The objectors in the New Jersey case filed a motion to treat all of the settlements as an aggregate "megafund," and award much lower percentages for attorney fees across the board. At the fairness hearing, counsel for the New Jersey objectors didn't persuade me that the New Jersey objectors have standing to object to proposed settlements in cases to which they aren't parties. I am denying their requests to treat these cases as a single "megafund," but the ruling and its reasoning are to be found only in the opinion and order in the New Jersey case - the case in which the objectors have standing.

The Manual for Complex Litigation reports that in deciding an award of attorney fees, courts should consider the size of the fund to be shared by the attorneys and class members; the number of class members who will share; any understandings on attorney compensation methods actually reached at the outset of the attorney-client relationship; any side agreements class counsel might have made; any objections by class members; the attorneys' skill and efficiency; the litigation's complexity and duration; the risks of nonrecovery and nonpayment; the amount of time reasonably devoted to the case by counsel (a factor not favored in our circuit); and awards in similar cases. Manual for Complex Litigation (Fourth) § 14.121 (2004). Guides to determining a prevailing market rate include comparable contracts, data from large common-pool cases where fees were privately negotiated, and information on class-counsel auctions. In re Synthroid Marketing Litig., 264 F.3d 712, 719-722 (7th Cir. 2001). I must bear in mind that the greater the fee award, the lower the recovery by each class member. Redman v. RadioShack, 768 F.3d at 629. In evaluating these factors, I have relied on the convincing affidavit of Professor Brian T. Fitzpatrick, as well as the rest of the record in this case.

There has been one objection to the fee request, but it doesn't challenge the amount of the request. As noted earlier, Mr. Patterson contends the attorney fees should be paid by FedEx Ground, not from the settlement proceeds. In the circumstances of this case, the law would have to change for me to sustain that objection. If a class action defendant pays the class's attorneys directly under a separate agreement, the court has no authority to review that separate contract when deciding whether the settlement is reasonable. Courts have developed a firm rule that when a common fund is created in a class action, such as when a defendant pays a lump sum in settlement, the attorneys' compensation is to come from the fund they helped create. See Skelton v. General Motors Corp., 800 F.2d 250, 252 (7th Cir. 1988). So I must overrule Mr. Patterson's objection to the fee award.

Mr. Patterson's objection didn't challenge the amount requested, and I have no information that any side agreements are involved, and the attorneys involved as co-lead counsel are very capable and experienced in wage and hour litigation (and they faced very capable and experienced attorneys that FedEx Ground hired). The size of the common fund is $12,196,729 after the third party administrator is paid, and up to 762 class members will share in the recovery. All discovery has been completed. Professor Fitzpatrick, an expert in the field of attorney fees in class actions, believes the requested 30 perfect fee is reasonable.

The named plaintiffs and their attorneys agreed at the outset of the litigation that counsel would be compensated with 33.33 percent of any recovery.

The duration of the litigation has been far greater than usual - this case is nearly 12 years old. In part, that duration reflects this case's having been co-mingled with the other cases in the MDL docket - it would have taken a judge in the Western District of Tennessee far less time to resolve class certification issues and summary judgment motions under Tennessee law than it took me to decide such things under the laws of 40 or so states - but it also reflects the complexity and risk involved. This class attacked FedEx Ground's business model, which was firmly grounded on the principle of using independent contractors rather than employees. The class members had a lot at stake, as shown by the damages expert's opinion that the class might recover more than $20 million, if everything broke for the plaintiffs. This was no nuisance suit or likely coupon settlement. A hard battle was predictable from day one.

The attorneys handled this case on a pure contingent fee basis. Whatever investment they made in discovery and briefing of class certification and summary judgment motion was made largely between 2006 and 2008 - ten years ago, give or take a year. That's much longer than average for contingent fee attorneys in class actions, according to Professor Fitzpatrick.

The plaintiffs wielded novel common law theories to establish their employee status. No well-developed Tennessee law supported any of their legal theories, and Tennessee courts had never considered whether a business entity could recover under Tennessee's Consumer Protection Act. They faced (and overcame) a challenge in obtaining certification of a statewide class that included drivers with single routes, drivers with multiple routes, drivers who hired others to handle a route, drivers who signed employment contracts and those who signed as corporate entities. So while the plaintiffs' bar generally views wage and hour cases as undesirable, Mr. Smith and his fellow drivers presented challenges that went well beyond the normal wage and hour case. The risk of non-liability and no compensation was great; these plaintiffs were in the court of appeals trying to reverse a finding of no-liability.

With all of that in their way, class counsel - armed primarily by a new direction in Kansas law and a few federal court of appeals decisions in cases the Panel remanded to transferor courts - achieved a truly remarkable result. FedEx Ground agreed to pay $12,257,000, reflecting 57 percent of what the plaintiffs thought they could recover if they ran the table.

Professor Fitzpatrick's analysis of recent cases from our circuit - which seems to have a greater preference than other circuits for the percentage-of-the-fund method of valuation - supports a fee award of 30 percent of the fund to be shared by counsel and class members. He reports that the average and median findings of market rate in contingent fee awards in labor and employment cases were 34.3 percent and 33.3 percent. He also noted that the awards he studied addressed only attorney fees and not expenses; co-lead counsel have included expenses within their requests. Plaintiffs' counsel report that expenses incurred in the MDL docket (not just in the Tennessee case) exceeded $7,713,000.

In some settings, the prevailing market rate for class counsel depends in part on the expected size of the payout at the end of the litigation. Professor Fitzpatrick concedes that his sample of awards in labor and employment class actions didn't include recoveries in large amounts. In the setting of a securities class action, the court of appeals said "[d]ata show that 27.5% is well above the norm for cases in which $100 million or more changes hands. Eisenberg and Miller find that the mean award from settlements in the $100 to $250 million range is 12% and the median 10.2%." Silverman v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., 739 F.3d 956, 958 (7th Cir. 2013).

The size of this class action settlement is much smaller than the $200 million involved in Silverman v. Motorola Solutions. But it blinks reality to ignore that while this case was settled individually, it's one of 20 that remain on the MDL docket, and the aggregate proposed settlements total more than $200 million, and far more when counting cases that have already been remanded. The remanded California case settled for $226.5 million on its own. See Alexander v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc., No. 05-cv-38, 2016 WL 3351017 (N.D. Cal. June 15, 2016). There's no doubt that much of the discovery behind these cases overlapped, and that co-lead counsel applied a concerted strategy in moving them to settlement. On the other hand, class counsel applied laws specific to Tennessee and conducted case-specific discovery. The settlement I am considering at this point only involves the Tennessee plaintiffs and fees.

Silverman v. Motorola Solutions doesn't present an apples-to-apples analysis. First, Professor Fitzpatrick points out that securities cases like Silverman v. Motorola Solutions differ from wage and hour litigation in many ways, not least of which that class certification in securities cases is nearly automatic under today's laws. In Smith v. FedEx Ground, as with all the other cases in this MDL docket, class counsel fought hard to get large classes certified, and (at the time of the settlements) would have seen those certifications revisited in every case in which they prevailed at the court of appeals.

Second, it's not clear that the Silverman v. Motorola Solutions analysis applies, or applies fully, to our case. As already noted, the settlement amount in this case - the Smith v. FedEx Ground case - isn't even in the ballpark of what was involved in Silverman v. Motorola Solutions; I have to look at many other cases even to reach the $50 million amount the Silverman court also mentioned.

It's also not clear whether I am expected, or even allowed, to consider the nature of the plaintiffs involved in a case. The plaintiffs in Silverman were investors in Motorola; the class representatives were institutional investors. Silverman v. Motorola, Inc., No. 07-C-4507, 2012 WL 1597388, at *4 (N.D. Ill. May 7, 2012). Institutional investors are likely to be more sophisticated in the market for legal services than the individual drivers in this case, and so likelier to agree at the outset to a tapered fee arrangement rather than a simple percentage-of-the-recovery arrangement.

Third, if I am to consider the other settlements in this MDL docket, it seems appropriate to consider as well that these named plaintiffs agreed at the outset to pay the attorney 33 percent of any recovery, without limitation as to how much the recovery might be. None of the class representatives in the 20 cases remanded to me have fee agreements for any percentage less than 30 percent.

A lodestar cross-check - inquiring into billable hours and billing rates - isn't encouraged in this circuit, see Williams v. Rohm and Haas Pension Plan, 658 F.3d 629, 638 (7th Cir. 2011); Cook v. Niedert, 142 F.3d 1004, 1013 (7th Cir. 1998), and I'm not undertaking such a cross-check. A very complex examination of time sheets, hourly rates in various markets, and records would be needed to arrive at a true lodestar figure for this case alone. Co-lead counsel report, just in case, that across this litigation (not just this case), co-lead counsel and their firms have devoted more than 149,393 hours, producing an unadjusted collective lodestar fee of $74,540,341 had they billed by the hour. It would take only a modest 1.3 multiplier, co-lead counsel tell me, for the lodestar calculation to match the percentage-of-the-fund calculation across the litigation.

Even identifying the precise amount attributable to work on the cases remaining in the MDL would be difficult. In Alexander v. FedEx Ground, for example, Judge Chen attributed about $12.4 million in lodestar work on the MDL to Alexander. See Alexander v. FedEx Ground, No. 05-cv-38, 2016 WL 3351017, at *3 (N.D. Cal. June 15, 2016). This would need to be subtracted out of co-lead counsel's estimated lodestar figure for the MDL, but the fee award in that case is on appeal and might be adjusted. The fee award is unpaid. Fee awards in other remanded cases total $6,304,893, and I would need to deduct the amount of fees expected to be paid in those that can be attributed to work on cases still in the MDL. I don't have an accurate way to calculate the denominator from which I can then derive a multiplier.

It seems inescapable that there is a significant spillover between the 20 cases remaining in MDL-1700. For example, the appeal/certification/re-argument in the Craig v. FedEx Ground case from Kansas clearly benefitted all of the classes; it was part of the trend in the law that seemed to be shifting away from FedEx Ground's legal position. The depositions co-lead counsel took of FedEx Ground's national officers produced information that applied to all of the cases. But the spillover might be less than it appears at first blush. Substantial discovery surrounded local dispatch terminals, and the lion's share of the briefs on class certification and summary judgment were devoted to the specific laws of the various states.

For me to count up, or assign weight to, the various points I have discussed (effectively transforming them into "factors") would be inconsistent with the law of our circuit. It would be what our court of appeals has called "chopped salad". In Re Synthroid Marketing Litig., 264 F.3d at 719. But these are the reasons I conclude that the requested 30 percent (after accounting for the costs of administration) produces a reasonable attorney fee:

1. At the outset of the attorney-client relationship, it would have been plain to the clients and attorneys that this litigation would be hard fought and would take years. FedEx Ground's very business model was at stake, and if the class was defined broadly, the drivers would have hundreds of thousands - maybe millions - at stake. The history of this case - what would have been the future at the outset of the relationship - was even worse, with the case being centralized in a multidistrict litigation docket, the extensive discovery already discussed, and a decade of litigation, and no end in sight that would benefit the plaintiffs.

2. Because of the anticipated duration of the case, it also would have been plain to all that the attorneys would have to turn away prospective clients and tie up their own funds for the life of the case.

3. Counsel produced exceptional results in the face of long odds. Tennessee law provided no assurance of success, and these plaintiffs were appellants at the time of the settlement. See Redman v. RadioShack, 768 F.3d at 633 ("the central consideration is what class

counsel achieved for the members of the class rather than how much effort class counsel invested in the litigation.").

4. The amount of recovery would have been a fraction of what this settlement proposal contains had counsel not persuaded me to certify a class that included drivers with a single work area, drivers with multiple work areas, drivers who contracted with FedEx Ground under a corporate identity, and drivers who simply hired others to cover some of their assigned routes.

5. Of the 20 fee contracts in the cases that remain in MDL-1700, none set a percentage of the recovery less than the 30 percent requested here, and some -including the one in this case - set the percentage at one-third of any recovery.

6. There is nothing from which I can infer that unsophisticated (in the market for legal services) clients - when compared with institutional plaintiffs - would request a tapered-fee arrangement.

7. The fee request, unlike those to which it might be compared, includes expenses rather than seeking them separately. While I can't say how much is attributable to the Tennessee case as opposed to the others co-lead counsel was handling, the overall total of expenses was $7.7 million.

8. Nobody has objected to the amount of co-lead counsel's fee request.

For all of these reasons, I approve, in large part, the proposed settlement agreement's proposed award of attorneys' fees and expenses, in the total amount of $3,645,000 (30 percent of the gross settlement amount, less the cost of administration).

IV. SERVICE AWARDS TO CLASS REPRESENTATIVE

Class counsel request service awards of $15,000 to each of the 5 named plaintiffs. Class counsel explain that (in addition to the extraordinary duration of their service) they did far more than the average class representatives. Reams of records had to be collected, the class representatives (like their counterparts in the companion cases) sat for grueling day-long depositions.

As noted earlier, Mr. Patterson objects because he believes the $15,000 figure is too high. But he gives me no explanation other than the sheer amount. He doesn't appear to object to the proposition that the named plaintiffs should get a service award in some amount to reflect their work in this case above and beyond the average class member. Class counsel notes that the requested awards are in line with several that have been approved in cases from within this circuit, citing Cook v. Niedert, 142 F.3d at 1016 ($25,000); In re Southwest Airlines Voucher Litig., No. 11 C 8176, 2013 WL 4510197, at *11 (N.D. Ill., Aug. 26, 2013) ($15,000 to 2 plaintiffs); Heekin v. Anthem, Inc., No. 05-cv-1908, 2012 WL 5878032 at *1 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 20, 2012) ($25,000); Am. Int'l Grp., Inc. v. ACE INA Holdings, Inc., No. 07 C 2898, 2012 WL 651727, at *17 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 28, 2012); ($25,000 to each of 7 plaintiffs); Will v. Gen. Dynamics Corp., Civ. No. 06-0698-GPM, 2010 WL 4818174 at *4 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2010) ($25,000 to 3 plaintiffs). Those cases make it clear to me - especially when one compares the extraordinary duration of this case to those cases - that Mr. Patterson is incorrect in his assessment of how much the named plaintiffs should receive by way of service awards. In response to Mr. Patterson's other question, co-lead counsel explained that these 5 people became class representatives because they are the ones who hired a lawyer to file the suit.

The request for $15,000 service awards for each of 5 the named plaintiffs is just, fair and reasonable.

V. CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing, the court:

(1) OVERRULES Kevin Patterson's objection to the proposed settlement [3:05cv600, Doc. 218].

(2) GRANTS IN PART the plaintiffs' unopposed motion for final approval of the Tennessee class action settlement calling for payment of $12,250,000 to the plaintiffs [Doc. No. 2883].

(3) GRANTS IN PART the plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees and costs [Doc. No. 2827]; AWARDS class representatives Arthur Smith, Robert Erbentraut, Buddy Johnson, Herbert Humphrey, and Rachella Westbrook $15,000 each for their services in this case; DIRECTS payment of that amount from the class settlement fund to them, in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement; and AWARDS plaintiffs' counsel $3,645,000 for their services on this case.

(4) ORDERS that:

A. The parties shall perform, or cause to be performed, the remaining terms of the settlement as set forth in the settlement agreement. The court authorizes the payment by the settlement administrator of the settlement funds in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement.

B. Prior timely opt-outs on the list maintained by the claims administrator are not included in, or bound by, this order and final judgment. Those timely opt-outs are not entitled to any recovery from the settlement proceeds obtained through this settlement.

C. The court hereby DISMISSES with prejudice this action, specifically including the Released Claims, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees, except as provided below. The court incorporates the Class Action Settlement Agreement [Doc. No. 2669-1] by reference in this order.

As set forth in the Settlement Agreement, "Released Claims" means all claims, actions, causes of action, administrative claims, demands, debts, damages, penalties, costs, interest, attorneys' fees, obligations, judgments, expenses, or liabilities, in law or in equity, whether now known or unknown, contingent or absolute, which: (i) are owned or held by the plaintiffs and class members and/or by their affiliated business entities (if any), or any of them, as against Releasees, or any of them; (ii) arise under any statutory or common law claim which was asserted in this lawsuit or, whether or not asserted, could have been brought arising out of or related to the allegations of misclassification of plaintiffs and class members as independent contractors set forth in the operative complaint; and (iii) pertain to any time in the Release Period. The Released Claims include any known or unknown claims for damages and injunctive relief. The Released Claims include but are not limited to claims under Tennessee Code §§ 29-14-102, 47-18-101 et seq., 29 USC §§ 1001 et seq., the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201; and common law claims for fraud, breach of contract, rescission, or declaratory judgment. The release excludes claims arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. Further definitions of "Released Claims" can be found in Sec. I, para. S of the Settlement Agreement [Doc. No. 2669-1].

"Releasees" means: "(a) [FedEx Ground], and its consolidated subsidiaries, successors, predecessors, assigns, affiliates, parent companies, shareholders, officers, directors, agents, insurers, attorneys, and employees; and (b) [FedEx Ground's] past, present, and future shareholders, officers, directors, agents, employees, attorneys, and insurers." (Settlement Agreement, Sec I, para. T). "Release Period" refers to the time period from May 11, 2000 through April 30, 2016. (Settlement Agreement, Sec. I, para. U). [Doc. No. 2669-1].

D. Upon the entry of this order, the plaintiffs and all class members shall be deemed to have fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and discharged all Released Claims against all Releasees. "Class members" include "All persons who: 1) entered into a FedEx Ground or FedEx Home Delivery form Operating Agreement (now known as form OP-149 and Form OP-149-RES); 2) drove a vehicle on a full-time basis (meaning exclusive of time off for commonly excused employment absences) from June 22, 1999 through October 15, 2007 to provide package pick-up and delivery services pursuant to the Operating Agreement; and 3) were dispatched out of a terminal in the state of Tennessee." [Doc. No. 2669-1]. A list of the class members is attached to this order as Exhibit A. To the extent additional individuals are identified who qualify as class members under the terms of the settlement agreement, they will be bound by this order.

E. Upon the entry of this final approval order, the plaintiffs and all class members are barred and enjoined from asserting, filing, maintaining, or prosecuting, or in any way participating in the assertion, filing, maintenance or prosecution, of any action asserting any Released Claim against any of the Releasees, as set forth in and in accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement. Nothing in this order shall in any way impair or restrict the right of the parties to enforce the terms of the settlement.

F. The Parties' agreed upon procedure for disbursement of the $122,500 reserve fund provided for in the Settlement Agreement and the Plaintiffs' Motion for Final Approval [Doc. No. 2883], with such claims to be paid approximately 220 days after checks are issued to pay the claims of persons who fit the class definition but who were not previously identified as members of the plaintiff class according to the settlement formula described in the Settlement Agreement. FedEx Ground will submit a list containing the names of such persons within 220 days of this order; this list will supplement the class member list attached as Exhibit A and such persons will be bound by this order.

G. The parties' request for appointment of Community Legal Center, 910 Vance Ave., Memphis, TN 38126 to be the cy pres beneficiary is APPROVED.

H. Neither the settlement, nor any act performed or document executed pursuant to or in furtherance of the settlement, is or may be deemed to be or may be used as: (a) an admission of, or evidence of, the validity of any Released Claim or any wrongdoing or liability of any Releasee; (b) an admission or concession by the plaintiff or any class member of any infirmity in the claims asserted in the operative complaint filed in this action; (c) an admission of, or evidence of, any fault or omission of any of the Releasees in any civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding in any court, administrative agency, or other tribunal.

I. The third-party administrator, Rust Consulting, Inc., may retain up to $75,000 as compensation for settlement administration.

J. Without affecting the finality of this judgment in any way, the court retains continuing jurisdiction over: (1) the enforcement of this order and final judgment; (2) the enforcement of the settlement agreement; (3) the distribution of the settlement proceeds to the class members and the cy pres beneficiary; and (4) class counsel's proposed allocation of attorney's fees to plaintiffs' counsel to be submitted to the court.

The clerk of this court is directed to immediately enter judgment accordingly.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: May 1, 2017

/s/ Robert L. Miller, Jr.

Judge

United States District Court

Exhibit A: TN Class List

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
1	16000018	MULLINS, AARON P
2	16000025	BARRY, JON DAVID	AIM HIGH LLC
3	16000032	STRIPLING, SCOTT STERLING	AKS ENTERPRISES LLC
4	16000049	QUINTANA, ALEJANDRO
5	16000056	LIBBY, MATTHEW	ALM MARKETING GROUP
6	16000063	SAMPSON, ANITA ROSE
7	16000070	DINGUS, MATTHEW STEPHEN	ANN LOY LLC
8	16000087	MOORMAN, ANNE ELIZABETH
9	16000094	MARTIN, ANTHONY
10	16000100	YELVINGTON, ANTHONY R.
11	16000117	SCALERA, ANTHONY
12	16000124	CATRON, MIKE C	ARLO-PEPPER INC	ARLO-PEPPER INC.
13	16000131	HUMMEL, BRANDON
14	16000148	GOODWIN, BRIAN GORDON
15	16000155	MILLER, BRIAN
16	16000162	ELLIS, BRUCE LEE
17	16000179	LUTTRELL, CARL DEAN
18	16000186	COLLINS, CARL MIKE
19	16000193	LOPEZ, CARLO SURIA
20	16000209	CALDWELL, CARSON
21	16000216	HAROLD, CASEY DEAN
22	16000223	MOORE, CEDRIC ANTHONY
23	16000230	FORESTER, CHAD
24	16000247	LAFEVER, CHAD
25	16000254	ROBERTS, CHAD
26	16000261	MURRAY, CHARLES BRONSON
27	16000278	LOVE, CHARLES
28	16000285	JOHNSON, CHARLES R.
29	16000292	PRINCE, CHARLES R
30	16000308	PEER JR., CHARLES RAYMOND
31	16000315	YEARGAN, CHARLES WESLEY
32	16000322	ANDERSON, CHRISTOPHER
33	16000339	SWANN, CHRIS DAVID
34	16000346	STREET, CHRISTOPHER
35	16000353	FAUST, CHUCK
36	16000360	CLIFTON, DAVID	CLIFTON CONTRACT DELIVERY INC
37	16000377	MCGINNIS, CLYDE
38	16000384	ESTES, COREY D.
39	16000391	BROOKS, CORRY DARNELL
40	16000407	ADAMS, CRAIG
41	16000414	DAVIS, CRAIG
42	16000421	MCCOLLUM, DALE M.
43	16000438	JAMISON, DANIELLE
44	16000445	HALL, DARRELL L.
45	16000452	HILLIARD, DAVID L.	HILLIARD TRUCKING, INC
46	16000469	LOFTEN, DAVID
47	16000476	LONG, DAVID
48	16000483	CHRISTENSEN, DAVID R.
49	16000490	HARRIS, DAVID W.
50	16000506	DAVIS, DAVID W.
51	16000513	HODGES, DEAN CHANDLER

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
52	16000520	ALLEN, DENNIS
53	16000537	ROBBINS, DENNIS RICHARD
54	16000544	MCELWEE, DERREON CLAY
55	16000551	CLARK, DIANNE E.
56	16000568	LONG, DONALD
57	16000575	TILSON, DONALD
58	16000582	ZECK II, DONALD WILLIAM
59	16000599	DAVIS, DOUG
60	16000605	SCOTT, EARL
61	16000612	COWAN, EDWARD
62	16000629	JOHNSONMARTINEZ, EVETTE NICHELLE
63	16000636	STOUT, SHEA
64	16000643	WINNIE, GARY DEAN
65	16000650	SAGER, GARY
66	16000667	NICHOLS, GARY STALEY
67	16000674	HAMILTON, GERALD
68	16000681	BROWN, BRIAN
69	16000698	WARD, EMILY CARYL	MEKA DELIVERY INC
70	16000704	HODGES, GERALD LYNN
71	16000711	HARRELL, GREGORY
72	16000728	HAUK, GREGORY C.
73	16000735	PATTERSON, AARON
74	16000742	TAYLOR, ANTHONY ARRON
75	16000759	GULLEY, ANTHONY
76	16000766	HATFIELD, ARTIE LEE	HARTFIELD INC
77	16000773	ROLLINS, BRUCE	B. ROLLINS INC.
78	16000780	BEASLEY, CHARLES E.	BEASLEY TRUCKING INC.
79	16000797	WILLIAMS, OLEN	BFJ ENTERPRISES INC.
80	16000803	BURKE, BILL
81	16000810	VIALL, BRAD
82	16000827	RAY, BRENTON KEITH
83	16000834	RICHMOND, BRETT
84	16000841	HOPKINS, BRIAN
85	16000858	YOUNT, BRIAN L
86	16000865	LEACH, BRIAN
87	16000872	BEARD, BUFORD A.
88	16000889	BREWER, COLBY BURKE	BURKENBROOKE TRANSPORTS INC.	BREWER BROTHERS DELIVERY INC	BREWER BROTHERS DELIVERY INC
89	16000896	NORFUL, LEWIE	CARTOON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES LLC
90	16000902	BOLDING, CHAD C.
91	16000919	DICKIE, CHAD ANTHONY
92	16000926	SHOEMAKE, CHADWICK BRETT
93	16000933	WILLIAMS, CHARLES E.
94	16000940	VAUGHN, CHARLES R
95	16000957	MCKINNEY, CHRIS CHRISTOPHER
96	16000964	YOUNG, CHRIS
97	16000971	COOPER JR., CURTIS RAYMOND
98	16000988	DENTON, DANNY
99	16000995	WEBB, DANNY
100	16001008	BLACKMON, DARON
101	16001015	FAUST, DAVID A.
102	16001022	HENDRICKSON, DAVID MICHAEL

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
103	16001039	MCCASLIN, DAVID
104	16001046	WOLFORD, DAVID ALLEN
105	16001053	CAPPS, DENNIS WAYNE
106	16001060	BELL, DEOBRAH JEROME	BELL TRUCKING LLC	BELL TRUCKING INC
107	16001077	PELL JR., DONNIE WARREN
108	16001084	HINSHAW, DOUG
109	16001091	DEITZ, DOUGLAS
110	16001107	MATTHEWS, EDWIN L.
111	16001114	PEELE, JEFFREY LAWRENCE	EX-PEELEDITE INC.	EX-PEELEDITE INC
112	16001121	FLETCHER, JONATHAN RAE	FLETCHER ENTERPRISES LLC
113	16001138	STOUT, FRANK
114	16001145	MATHEWS, FRANK
115	16001152	LETURMY, GARY LOUIS
116	16001169	DAVIS, GARY PHILIP
117	16001176	FUNNELL, GENE D.
118	16001183	SMITH, GREGORY ALLEN	INTEGRITY PACKAGE SERVICES INC.
119	16001190	THOMPSON, GREGORY
120	16001206	TOMES, HAROLD J.
121	16001213	THOMPSON, HAROLD W.
122	16001220	HEADRICK, DAVID A.	HEADRICK DELIVERY SERVICE INC
123	16001237	HENDRIX, JERRY	HENDRIX INC.
124	16001244	HART, HENRY EDWARD	HARTFIELD INC
125	16001251	HODGSON, BRIAN	HODGSON ENTERPRISES INC
126	16001268	HOUSE, RONALD	HOUSE DELIVERY SERVICE INC.
127	16001275	HENDRIX, RICK	INVESTMENT CO INC
128	16001282	LIPHFORD, JOSEPH	J&J ENTERPRISES
129	16001299	HUTTINGER, JACK
130	16001305	WALL, KATHY	JACKALOPE VENTURES INC.
131	16001312	STEPHENS, JACOB
132	16001329	EDMONDSON, JAMES BRUCE
133	16001336	CRUZ, JAMES
134	16001343	RITCHIE, JAMES DAVID
135	16001350	EDWARDS, JAMES GARRETT
136	16001367	MCNEER, JAMES
137	16001374	HYDE, JAMES MIKE
138	16001381	PIERCE, JAMES
139	16001398	SHEEHAN, JAMES	SHEEHAN TRUCKING INC
140	16001404	YOUNG, JAMES
141	16001411	BARR, JASON
142	16001428	CLARK, JASON
143	16001435	DENTON, JASON
144	16001442	GRIFFIN, JASON TIMOTHY
145	16001459	MCMILLAN, JASON WADE
146	16001466	COX, JEFF
147	16001473	HANEY, JEFF THOMAS
148	16001480	SAVALOJA, JEFFREY J.
149	16001497	RIDINGS, JEFFREY SCOTT
150	16001503	HILL, JEREMIAH SHEA
151	16001510	MARSHALL, JEREMY J.
152	16001527	PETERS, JEREMY
153	16001534	STAFFORD, JEREMY

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
154	16001541	BULLINGTON, JERRY
155	16001558	ADAMS, JERRY D.
156	16001565	HARGROVE, JERRY DEAN
157	16001572	THOMAS, JERRY GLENN
158	16001589	WILEY, JERRY
159	16001596	SVOBODA, JAMES	JIM'S DELIVERY SERVICE INC.
160	16001602	WHITENER, JON	JLP TRANSPORT LLC
161	16001619	DODSON, JOE JOE
162	16001626	WALKER, JOE	SAW TRUCKING INC.	S&W TRUCKING INC
163	16001633	RAYBURN, JOEL
164	16001640	STREET JR., JOEL T.
165	16001657	SWAFFORD, JOHN EDWARD
166	16001664	MOTRONI, JOHN
167	16001671	BICKERSTAFF, JOHNNY
168	16001688	GUY JR., JOHNNY LEE
169	16001695	LAY, JON MAXWELL
170	16001701	DIXON, JONATHAN R	BEAUTIFUL DISASTER, INC.
171	16001718	DAVIS, JONATHON
172	16001725	CRUZ, JOSELITO S.
173	16001732	SABO, JOSEPH GEORGE
174	16001749	KELLY III, JOSEPH
175	16001756	EUBANKS, JOSEPH TODD
176	16001763	SMITH, JOSHUA ANDREW
177	16001770	SAMAHA, JOSHUA J.
178	16001787	CASTILON, DAVID	K&M FULLFILLMENT LLC
179	16001794	ALLARD, KEITH M.
180	16001800	WEIGOLD, KEITH
181	16001817	SWARTZ, KELLY HULL
182	16001824	ATWELL, KENNETH
183	16001831	LENTZ JR., KENNETH D.
184	16001848	HANEY, KENNETH ERIC
185	16001855	LODEN, KENNETH L.	LODEN UP INC
186	16001862	NOLAN, KENNETH WAYNE
187	16001879	MILLIGAN, KERRY
188	16001886	MONTGOMERY, KEVIN C
189	16001893	COPLEY, KEVIN
190	16001909	BREWER, KEVIN D.
191	16001916	SOMMER, KEVIN
192	16001923	STOHR, KURTIS A
193	16001930	GAW, LANDON W.
194	16001947	CAVES, LARA J
195	16001954	AVERY, LARRY
196	16001961	DAVIS, LARRY E.
197	16001978	KING, LARRY G.
198	16001985	RODRIGUEZ, LARRY PHILLIP
199	16001992	RITTER, LARRY
200	16002005	GRIFFIN, LAWRENCE
201	16002012	GIBSON, LESTER
202	16002029	MALONE, ALAN	LOVE TO CARE SERVICES INC
203	16002036	MYERS, LYNFORD DEAN
204	16002043	LARUE, LYNN

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
205	16002050	MILLER, LYNN
206	16002067	PERRY, M. BEN
207	16002074	SPENCER, MACARTHUR M
208	16002081	SCHUMER, MARK ANDREW
209	16002098	HAYDEN, MARK ANTHONY
210	16002104	THOMAS, MARK C.
211	16002111	MCCOY, MARK M.
212	16002128	STUTTS, MARK	M.W. STUTTS TRANSPORTATION INC
213	16002135	ANDREWS, MARTE B.
214	16002142	BAUMGARDNER, MARTHA
215	16002159	STILLWELL, MARTY
216	16002166	ANDERSON, MATTHEW BRYAN
217	16002173	MAYES, SHAWN S.	MAYES TRANSPORT INC.
218	16002180	CORRY, MICHAEL	PALE HORSE DELIVERY INC
219	16002197	RUSHING, MICHAEL GLENN
220	16002203	ONEIL, MICHAEL GREGROY
221	16002210	CORRIER, MICHAEL JOSEPH
222	16002227	NICOLETTI, MICHAEL L.
223	16002234	LENZEN, MICHAEL DEAN	MSL VENTURES INC.
224	16002241	NATEQI, MICHAEL M
225	16002258	MEEKS, MICHAEL
226	16002265	MILLS, MICHAEL SHANE
227	16002272	WRIGHT, MICHAEL	WHW FREIGHT INC	WHW FREIGHT, INC
228	16002289	EDWARDS, MITCHELL
229	16002296	HENDERSON, MITCHELL
230	16002302	BROWN, NATHAN D	DOWNTOWN DELIVERIES INC	DOWNTOWN DELIVERIES INC.
231	16002319	LOVELAND, NATHAN WILLIAM
232	16002326	AKOTO, NELSON KOFI
233	16002333	INGLE, NICHOLAS RYAN
234	16002340	COLE, NICK
235	16002357	PRICE, NICK	SIMPLICITY COMPANY
236	16002364	NIGGL, BRIAN KEITH	NIGGL'S ELITE TRANSPORT INC
237	16002371	GALLMAN, NORMAN ALEX
238	16002388	ELLIS III, OSCAR LEO
239	16002395	FENNER, PAUL
240	16002401	LAKINS, PAUL GARY
241	16002418	SMITH, PAUL M.
242	16002425	WALSH, PAUL
243	16002432	EDWARDS, PAULETTE
244	16002449	SIERRA, PEDRO
245	16002456	RUSSELL, PERRY
246	16002463	BOULOGNE, PIERRE
247	16002470	BOLEYJACK, PORTER
248	16002487	WITTIG, RALPH F.
249	16002494	KEEN, RANDALL
250	16002500	CHAPMAN, RANDALL LEE
251	16002517	SHUMWAY, RANDY D.
252	16002524	REHBERG, GARY	REHBERG DELIVERS INC.
253	16002531	BLAKE, RICHARD ALAN
254	16002548	WALKER, RICHARD BRENT
255	16002555	MCDOUGALD JR., RICHARD JUNIOUS

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
256	16002562	SMITH, RICHARD
257	16002579	WITZBERGER, RICHARD R.
258	16002586	WESLEY, RICHARD SCOTT
259	16002593	BEECHAM, RICKY
260	16002609	ROBINSON, RICKY LADELL
261	16002616	PRICE JR., RICKY LYNN
262	16002623	GAW, RIDLEY WAYNE
263	16002630	GREER, ROBBIE
264	16002647	BULL, ROBERT L
265	16002654	CROW JR., ROBERT
266	16002661	GORDON, ROBERT E.
267	16002678	COOK IV, ROBERT EDWARD
268	16002685	FOSTER, ROBERT
269	16002692	HINES, ROBERT
270	16002708	LANE, ROBERT
271	16002715	MCGEE, ROBERT
272	16002722	REEVES, ROBERT LEE
273	16002739	CONLEY, ROBERT TODD
274	16002746	JESTER, RONALD BRANT
275	16002753	YODERS, RONALD
276	16002760	HUGHES, RONALD SCOTT	R.S.H. TRANSPORTATION INC.
277	16002777	EDWARDS, RUSSELL
278	16002784	WILLIAMS, RUSSELL T.
279	16002791	HUTCHESON, SAM CATE
280	16002807	SHEARON, SARA J.
281	16002814	DUNCAN, SCOTT ALAN
282	16002821	BLEVINS, SCOTT ALAN
283	16002838	BORDELON, SCOTT
284	16002845	HOPKINS, SEAN S.
285	16002852	HUGHES, SELINA
286	16002869	LANCE, JIMMY SHAWN
287	16002876	GARRISON, SHERYL
288	16002883	VANCE, STACEY
289	16002890	STANLEY, CLIFFORD EUGENE	STANLEY PACKAGE EXPRESS INC.
290	16002906	STEELE, BECKY	STEELE HANGER INC.
291	16002913	ROBERTS, STEPHEN DAVID
292	16002920	BRODIEN, STEPHEN G.
293	16002937	MCNABB, STEPHEN
294	16002944	HAYES, STEPHEN MICHAEL
295	16002951	ANDERSON, STEPHEN P.
296	16002968	MCMULLEN, STEPHON EDMON
297	16002975	CHATTIN, STEVE
298	16002982	BARBER, STEVEN FORREST	AVENUE VENTURES INC
299	16002999	HAUGE, STEVEN
300	16003002	POWERS, SYLVIA
301	16003019	MEREDITH, TERESA P
302	16003026	CALL, TERRY E.
303	16003033	FORRESTER, TERRY M.
304	16003040	PEYTON, TERRY
305	16003057	SYKES, TERRY
306	16003064	MAYERS, THOMAS D.

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
307	16003071	GILL, THOMAS
308	16003088	MCCONNELL III, THOMAS GRANT
309	16003095	TRIBELL, THOMAS RUSSELL	TRIBELL INC.
310	16003101	ROSS, THOMAS W.
311	16003118	WRIGHT, THOMAS
312	16003125	SMITH, TIM
313	16003132	WADDELL, TIM
314	16003149	SCOTT, TIMMY THOMAS
315	16003156	ABSHER, TIMOTHY
316	16003163	DANIELS SR., TIMOTHY DARNELL
317	16003170	EUBANKS, TIMOTHY DEWAYNE
318	16003187	HARR, TIMOTHY
319	16003194	WALL, TODD E.
320	16003200	DAVIS, TONY
321	16003217	CRUTCHER, TORRE JAJUAN
322	16003224	PHARRIS, TROY	TROY'S TRUCKING INC
323	16003231	LONG, TYRONE C.
324	16003248	FLECHA, VICTOR
325	16003255	HACKLER, VIRGINIA
326	16003262	WALLER, PAUL LLOYD	WALLERS PACKAGE SERVICE INC.
327	16003279	HARRIS, WES
328	16003286	BROWN, WESLEY ERIC
329	16003293	GABLE, WILLIAM ASBURY
330	16003309	EDMOND, WILLIAM MITCHELL
331	16003316	ROLEN, WILLIAM ALBERT
332	16003323	NANCE, WILLIAM SCOTT
333	16003330	CLIFTON, WILLIAM STEPHEN
334	16003347	WILLIAMS, DENNIS	WILLIAMS TRUCKING INC.
335	16003354	ROBERSON, WOLFGANG J.
336	16003361	BOWLING, ZACHARY IAN
337	16003378	TOURE, BABACAR
338	16003385	BARRINGER, BLAKE DOUGLAS
339	16003392	COMPTON, BRIAN KEITH
340	16003408	DUKE, BRIAN EDWARD
341	16003415	BUTTERBAUGH, BRION K.	SPECIALIZED RURAL TRANSPORTATION INC
342	16003422	SEAY, CHARLES JEFFREY
343	16003439	TAYLOR, CHARLES THOMAS
344	16003446	MERSHON, CHRIS
345	16003453	HILL, DARIN TODD
346	16003460	OWNBY JR., DENNIS
347	16003477	FRENCH, DEREK B
348	16003484	HAMMER, DOUG MACK
349	16003491	DUKEIV, THOMAS U.	DUKE LOGISTICS
350	16003507	WAUGH SR., DUSTIN WESLEY
351	16003514	COLE, EDRIC
352	16003521	SLATER, ERIC EDWARD	S&R DELIVERY INC
353	16003538	HARLEY, GAYLE
354	16003545	BURCHELL, GENE
355	16003552	HARNESS, GLEN
356	16003569	GALLIHER, GREGORY
357	16003576	GIBSON, JASON DOUGLAS

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
358	16003583	ROMANS, JASON
359	16003590	BOHANAN, JEFF
360	16003606	BRADDY, JIMMIE W.
361	16003613	LAWRENCE, JOEL M.
362	16003620	CHOATE, JOHN BRIAN
363	16003637	MCCREA, JOHN EWING
364	16003644	GOODMAN, JOHNNY WAYNE
365	16003651	CUMMINGS, JON GARLAND
366	16003668	HOUSER, JON
367	16003675	BONNER, MARK
368	16003682	FARLEY, MICHAEL
369	16003699	WILSON, MICHAEL K.
370	16003705	SELLS, MICHAEL TERRY
371	16003712	ALLISON, MIKE
372	16003729	DAVIS, MICHAEL
373	16003736	KINNAIRD, MIKE
374	16003743	RECORD, MIKE
375	16003750	MOWRY, BRYAN	MOWRY EXPRESS
376	16003767	JOHNSTON, NATHAN
377	16003774	BUZZUTTO, NICHOLAS MICHAEL
378	16003781	BROWNE, MICHAEL	OVERSHARE SERVICES
379	16003798	BECK, PAUL
380	16003804	HEATHERLY, PHILLIP
381	16003811	BRANDON, PHILLIP JAY
382	16003828	DAUGHERTY, RANDY
383	16003835	RICHIE, RANDY
384	16003842	KIRBY, RAY L.
385	16003859	HOLLOWAY, RICHARD
386	16003866	BUCHANAN, ROBERT
387	16003873	MCDANIEL, ROBERT MURPHY
388	16003880	SEIGENTHALER, ROBERT STEVEN
389	16003897	DENT, RODNEY
390	16003903	ALLISON, RODNEY L.	ALLISON & ALLISON TRANSPORTATION INC
391	16003910	GIST, RONALD
392	16003927	SAFIR, ROY
393	16003934	WESTCOT, SAMUEL MILTON
394	16003941	BLAKE, SEDRICK
395	16003958	RICE, STACY
396	16003965	CHASE, STEVEN G.
397	16003972	CHAMBERS, TAMMY
398	16003989	PULKER, TED
399	16003996	WILLETTE, TED
400	16004009	DUNN, TIMOTHY
401	16004016	MCMILLAN, TONY GLENN
402	16004023	TAYLOR, WILLIAM NEAL
403	16004030	MALLOW, WILLIAM SCOTT
404	16004047	TAYLOR, ADRYAN
405	16004054	DALE, BARNEY LEVON
406	16004061	RAMSEY, BILL
407	16004078	BRIGGS, BILLY
408	16004085	HARPER, BILLY KEITH

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
409	16004092	SANFORD, BILLY NOEL
410	16004108	RICHARDSON, BILLY
411	16004115	OQUINN, BOBBY
412	16004122	WOODS, BRADLEY P.
413	16004139	GOLDEN, BRANDON DEWAYNE
414	16004146	MILLER, BRIAN KEITH
415	16004153	CAMPBELL, BRUCE
416	16004160	JOHNSON, BUDDY
417	16004177	THOMAS, CHRISTOPHER DION	TRINITY TRUCKING INC.
418	16004184	HARGRAVE, CHRISTOPHER
419	16004191	RONCSKEVITZ, MARLENE	CROSSROADS HOME DELIVERY INC.
420	16004207	FLETCHER, DALE A.	GROUNDMEN INC
421	16004214	BEASLEY, DANETTE
422	16004221	BRASWELL, DANIEL W.
423	16004238	THOMPSON, DARNELL
424	16004245	DANIELS, DARRYL K.
425	16004252	DARNELL, DARYL WAYNE
426	16004269	CASEY, DAVID
427	16004276	ENGHOLM, DAVID
428	16004283	KILE JR., DAVID L
429	16004290	CAINE, DAVID M
430	16004306	MALLERY, DAVID
431	16004313	LAFEVER, DAVID MICHAEL
432	16004320	OLSON, DAVID R.
433	16004337	MCEWEN, DEBBIE
434	16004344	HERRELL, DEREK
435	16004351	WASHINGTON, DONALD E.
436	16004368	WALLSMITH, DOUG
437	16004375	KING, ED
438	16004382	SMITH, EDGAR
439	16004399	JONES, EDWARDSCOTT TERRY
440	16004405	MATHIS, FARRIS L.
441	16004412	ARMSTRONG, FREDERICK JERMAINE
442	16004429	BREEDLOVE, GARY
443	16004436	LENFEST, GARY
444	16004443	BLOOMFIELD, GREG	SMOKEY MOUNTAIN EXPRESS
445	16004450	LINKOUS, GREG
446	16004467	POOLE, GREGORY
447	16004474	SOWDER, GREGORY
448	16004481	BACKHURST, HARRY EDWARD
449	16004498	WILLIAMS JR., HERBERT
450	16004504	DANIEL III, HUGH HARRIS
451	16004511	SCUDERI, IVAN GIUSEPPE
452	16004528	SALANSKY, JEFFREY TED	JR SKY, INC.
453	16004535	FORD, JAMES KEITH	FTS INC
454	16004542	MOORE, JAMES M
455	16004559	MAYS, JAMES
456	16004566	STUBBS, JAMES
457	16004573	TROBAUGH, JAMES
458	16004580	WESTMORELAND, JASON EDWARD
459	16004597	WALLER, JAY

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
460	16004603	HUFF, JASON
461	16004610	LEJEUNE, JEFFREY DEAN	A & J ENTERPRISES INC
462	16004627	KEENE, JEFF
463	16004634	RIGGS, JEREMIAH ROBERT
464	16004641	JENKINS, JERRI
465	16004658	DOTSON, JOEL
466	16004665	FULLER, JOHN A.
467	16004672	DENNEY, JOHN
468	16004689	MILLIGAN, JOHN
469	16004696	MURDOCK, JOHN
470	16004702	WALKER, JOHN
471	16004719	OGG, JOHN WILLIAM
472	16004726	GRAVES, JOHNNY ALLEN
473	16004733	STURM, JONATHAN LANCE	STURM TRUCKING INC
474	16004740	BANE, JOSEPH
475	16004757	HULL, JOSEPH L.	POWER VISION INC	POWER VISION INC.
476	16004764	WASHINGTON, KARLA MICHELLE
477	16004771	ROEBUCK, KELVIN
478	16004788	FADDIS, KENNETH	KEN FADDIS INC.
479	16004795	POTTS, KENNETH
480	16004801	SPENCER, KEVIN D
481	16004818	LAU, KEVIN R.
482	16004825	TWILLEY, LARRY
483	16004832	RITCHIE, MARGARET
484	16004849	MITCHELL, MARK A.
485	16004856	HAMILTON, MARK CHARLES
486	16004863	COFFMAN, MARK
487	16004870	PALMER, MARK F
488	16004887	SALLER, MARK
489	16004894	BROWN, MATTHEW CHRISTIAN
490	16004900	DUGGER, MICHAEL
491	16004917	GATELEY, MICHAEL H.
492	16004924	MORRISON, MICHAEL J.
493	16004931	DOUTHIT, MICHAEL PAUL
494	16004948	PRICE, MICHAEL
495	16004955	OSBORN, MICHAEL W.
496	16004962	MOWRY, MIKE ALAN
497	16004979	JEFFRIES, PAUL EUGENE
498	16004986	BILLINGTON, PHILIP S.
499	16004993	MCCANN, PHILLIP ALAN
500	16005006	STACY, PHILLIP
501	16005013	SLUSS, RANDALL A.
502	16005020	WILLIAMS, RICKY
503	16005037	BLANKENSHIP, ROB
504	16005044	WEBSTER III, ROBERT THOMAS	WEBSTER ENTERPRISE INC
505	16005051	MCKINNEY, ROBERT KEVIN
506	16005068	REED, ROBERT LEE	FIVE GUYS TRANSPORT INC
507	16005075	WYATT, ROBERT WESLEY
508	16005082	SILLS, CHRISTOPHER LYNN	ROOSTER 21 LLC
509	16005099	CECIL, ROSS
510	16005105	ROGERS, ROY MICHEAL

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
511	16005112	TRIPP, SCOTT R.
512	16005129	VISHENGRAD, JOSEF	SHALOM EXPRESS
513	16005136	BROWN, STEVE
514	16005143	SHELTON, STEVE
515	16005150	DEVANEY, STEVEN
516	16005167	GRAYSON, THOMAS
517	16005174	HICKS, THOMAS LAMONT
518	16005181	ROBERTS, TIMOTHY G.
519	16005198	GRANT, TIMOTHY
520	16005204	WALLACE, TIMOTHY J.
521	16005211	MILLER, TIMOTHY LEE
522	16005228	HAMILTON, CECIL HUGH	TOBIEBARKLEY LLC
523	16005235	PALMER, TONY RAY
524	16005242	PILKENTON, TRACY
525	16005259	HILL, WILLIAM GEORGE
526	16005266	STOWE, WILLIAM SCOTT
527	16005273	WOODARD, KEVIN RICHARD
528	16005280	SEIBER, CHAD
529	16005297	FORKUM, AARON	A&J DELIVERY INC.
530	16005303	HAMILTON, ADAM JORDAN
531	16005310	LOFTY, ALBERT
532	16005327	KNOWLES, ANDREA O.
533	16005334	POTEETE, ANDREW CRUSOE
534	16005341	HENDRICKSON SR., ANDREW BLAKE
535	16005358	DELANEY, ANDREW J.	AJD WORKHORSE LLC	DHC INC
536	16005365	SPRINKLES, ANDREW
537	16005372	MOLINA, APOLINAR
538	16005389	SMITH, ARTHUR
539	16005396	HALLORAN, ASHLEY EUGENE
540	16005402	CLARK, AVERY
541	16005419	BEARD, LACY LEE	BEARD DELIVERY SERVICE LLC
542	16005426	WATKINS, BENJAMIN EDWARD
543	16005433	MERRITT, BETTY
544	16005440	MONTFORD, BOBBY
545	16005457	ATWOOD, BOBBY R.
546	16005464	ANDERSON, BRADLEY
547	16005471	MARTIN, BRANDY R
548	16005488	OWNBY, BRENDA
549	16005495	TOLLESON, BRUCE
550	16005501	PATTY, BRYAN
551	16005518	DOWLEN, BRYANT
552	16005525	LAKE JR., CALVIN H.
553	16005532	KING, CAREY MICHAEL
554	16005549	HANNAH, CATHERINE D.
555	16005556	WHARTON, CATHY LYNN
556	16005563	DEGARMO, CHARLES EDWARD
557	16005570	BROWN, CHARLIE
558	16005587	BING, CHERYL
559	16005594	HORNER, CHRIS
560	16005600	HILL, CHRISTOPHER RAY
561	16005617	STIVERS, CHRIS

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
562	16005624	CATES, CHRISTOPHER JOE
563	16005631	FOSTER, CLAUDE PHILLIP
564	16005648	FARMER, JOSEPH FETCHER	CLAXTON SUPPLY INC.
565	16005655	SHUART, CLIFFORD
566	16005662	SIHARATH, CODY
567	16005679	COLLOM, ANGELA	COLLOM INC.
568	16005686	REYMER, COREY
569	16005693	LAFEVER, DAVID LEE	D & S DELIVERY INC
570	16005709	MEYER, DAVID P.
571	16005716	PAYNE, DAVID
572	16005723	WARFIELD, DAVID EDWARD
573	16005730	VADEN, DON
574	16005747	CALLAHAN, DOUGLAS M.
575	16005754	RAINWATER, EDWARD
576	16005761	FARRELL, EDWIN J.
577	16005778	MORGAN, JEFFERY WAYNE	MORGAN & MORGAN ENT. LLC	MORGAN-MORGAN TRANSPORTATION INC
578	16005785	HARVELL, EMMETT	EMMETT L. HARVELL INC.
579	16005792	NEWBERN, ENNIS F.
580	16005808	AUSTEIN, ERIC A
581	16005815	SATTERFIELD, EVERETT E.
582	16005822	STILTNER, FREDA
583	16005839	GILL, FREDERICK KENT
584	16005846	FISHER, GARY W.
585	16005853	SIMPSON, GEORGE H.
586	16005860	COOPER, GEORGE N.
587	16005877	MYERS, GREG
588	16005884	SCHOONOVER, GREG HARRISON
589	16005891	TUCKER, HILTON D.
590	16005907	GOINS, HOBERT DWIGHT	LAND D TRUCKING INC.
591	16005914	VAUGHN, ISAAC ANTHONY
592	16005921	APODACA, JAMES	APODACA PACKAGE SYSTEM INC.	APODACA PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
593	16005938	COOP, JAMES
594	16005945	STAFFORD, JAMES DANIEL
595	16005952	WILES, JAMES ALAN
596	16005969	SKALNIK, JAMISON H
597	16005976	MEARS, JASON AARON
598	16005983	HINES, JEFFERY
599	16005990	CATRON, JEFFERY S.
600	16006003	SPIVEY, JEREMY WAYNE
601	16006010	RAY, JOEL DEWAYNE
602	16006027	JARMON JR., JOHN
603	16006034	HOPKINS, JOHN M.	HOPKINS TRANSPORT INC	KNOX PACKAGE SYSTEMS
604	16006041	MARTIN, JONATHAN G.
605	16006058	FLORES, JOSE SOTO
606	16006065	CALLAHANJR, JOSEPH RICHARD
607	16006072	TAYLOR, KEN STUART
608	16006089	BARRETT, L. WAYNE
609	16006096	MARTIN, LEE
610	16006102	CHANDLER, JESSIE	LEMIK CORPORATION
611	16006119	HOBLET, LISA
612	16006126	SHARP, LLOYD MYRON

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
613	16006133	NUNNALLY, MARCUS D.
614	16006140	SWANSON, MARK A.
615	16006157	PENNEY, MARK
616	16006164	RANDOLPH, MARK
617	16006171	RHEA, MARK
618	16006188	CHANDLER, MARVIN
619	16006195	NICHOLS, MARVIN M.
620	16006201	PEAKS, MAYLON R
621	16006218	MCLAIN, TINA	MCLAIN DELIVERY SERVICE
622	16006225	PLUNK, GREG	METRO DELIVERY SYSTEMS INC.	P&D DELIVERY INC	P & D DELIVERY INC.
623	16006232	WADE, MICHAEL
624	16006249	SMITH, PAMELA D.
625	16006256	CHESTNUTT, PAUL CARL
626	16006263	HEATHCOCK, PAUL
627	16006270	IOANNIDES, PAUL
628	16006287	BAZEMORE, PHILLIP ALLAN
629	16006294	MOORE, JEFF	PLUS M EXPRESS
630	16006300	SCOTT, QUINCY
631	16006317	WESTBROOK, RACHELLE
632	16006324	BROWNLEE, RALPH
633	16006331	BROWN, RAYMOND E.
634	16006348	COPES, REGINALD
635	16006355	PORTER, RENWICK
636	16006362	EDMONDSON JR., RICHARD
637	16006379	HUNT, RICHARD HUFFMAN
638	16006386	TOLLESON, RICHARD
639	16006393	MCDANIEL, ROBERT BRANNON
640	16006409	HOPSON, ROBERT
641	16006416	DELORME, ROBERT JUSTIN
642	16006423	CALL, ROBERT W.
643	16006430	WEBBER, ROBERT
644	16006447	WEEKS, ROBERT
645	16006454	COLE SR., ROGER ALLEN
646	16006461	BERNARD, ROGER F.
647	16006478	BENNETT, ROGER TRACY
648	16006485	RAINS, RONALD D.
649	16006492	MALONE, RONALD KEVIN	RONALD K. MALONE INC.
650	16006508	RAY, RONALD GLYNN
651	16006515	JOHNSON, SAMUEL
652	16006522	ARNOLD, SCOTT
653	16006539	DREHER, SCOTT ALAN
654	16006546	VAUGHN, SHANE
655	16006553	UHDE, SHERRI MICHELLE
656	16006560	BAILEY, SHERYL LYNN
657	16006577	HOOPER, STEVEN
658	16006584	GARNER, SHERI	SUB ZERO INC
659	16006591	TINKER, SUSAN
660	16006607	ROGERS, TERRY
661	16006614	WILLIAMS, TIMOTHY L.
662	16006621	ELLIOTT, TIMOTHY LOWERY
663	16006638	RAMPAUL, TIMOTHY DALE	RAMPAUL TRUCKING INC

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
664	16006645	LAWSON, TIMOTHY T.
665	16006652	BRIGGS, TONY
666	16006669	WALLACE, TONY MICHAEL
667	16006676	STEWART, TONY
668	16006683	VAUGHN SR., TONY DEWAYNE
669	16006690	HICKS, TRAVIS DWIGHT
670	16006706	JACKSON, WALTER
671	16006713	TAYLOR, WILLIAM SCOTT
672	16006720	BESIC, DAMIR	ZANNE TRANS, INC
673	16006737	SMITH, BRANDON	ALL HIS INC	ALL HIS INC.
674	16006744	DICKENS, CHARLES	DICKENS TRUCKING INC
675	16006751	HOLMES, CHARLES
676	16006768	AVILA, ALVIN	BADD PIRATE LLC
677	16006775	MURPHY, DARNELL L.
678	16006782	KRIMINGER, DARRELL	D.W. KRIMINGER INC.	DW KRIMINGER INC.
679	16006799	GARDENHIRE, DAVID	HOSE INC.
680	16006805	JACKSON, DAVID
681	16006812	TAYLOR, DURWIN	DMD INCORPORATED
682	16006829	SMITH, MATTHEW P.
683	16006836	SMITH, MATTHEW	DOUBLE DIAMOND DELIVERY INC.
684	16006843	HICKMAN III, LESTER EDWARD	E.K. ENTERPRISE LLC
685	16006850	HOLLIS, FRANKLIN	HOLLIS TRANSPORTATION INC.
686	16006867	LEONNIG, GLENN LAWRENCE	GLENMAC CARTAGE INC.	GLENMAC
687	16006874	LEONNIG, GLENN LAWRENCE	GLENMAC CARTAGE INC.	GLENMAC
688	16006881	HUGHES, GLENN MASON
689	16006898	RAY, GREGORY EUGENE
690	16006904	BISHOP, ROY	HOWZIT INC.
691	16006911	LAWRENCE, JAMES D.	J & S LOGISTICS LLC	J & S LOGISTICS INC
692	16006928	LAWRENCE, JAMES D.	J & S LOGISTICS LLC	J & S LOGISTICS INC
693	16006935	CRAVENS, JAMIE
694	16006942	HARP, JASON RANDALL	JORDAN TRANSPORTATION INC
695	16006959	BEAN, BRADLEY JAMES	BEAN'S INC.
696	16006966	SIRCY, JEFFREY V.
697	16006973	TUCKER, JODY	TANNER TRANSPORT INC.
698	16006980	BECK, JOHN BEN	MIDDLE TENNESSEE TRANSIT LLC	MIDDLE TENNESSEE TRANSIT
699	16006997	WILLIAMS, OLEN	BFJ ENTERPRISES INC.
700	16007000	BETCHER, CHRISTY
701	16007017	NORRIS, WILLIAM	NORRIS PACKAGE SERVICE
702	16007024	WILLIAMS, KENNETH DALE
703	16007031	PATTERSON, KEVIN LEWIS
704	16007048	HOLMAN, KIM
705	16007055	MALSY, KRISTIE LYNN
706	16007062	STONE, MARK MATTHEW
707	16007079	SHEARON, MARK	M & T TRUCKING, INC
708	16007086	JOHNSON JR , MARK STEVEN
709	16007093	STUTTS, MARK	M.W. STUTTS TRANSPORTATION INC
710	16007109	PATTERSON, MARVIN JAY
711	16007116	BLURTON, BOB
712	16007123	GLASCO, MICHAEL D.	BEAR DOG DELIVERY LLC
713	16007130	MITCHELL, TERRY D.	MITCHELL TRANSPORTATION INC.
714	16007147	MOORE, SALLIE M	MOORE TRANSPORTATION, INCF.

Count	RustID	Contractor Name	Company Name 1	Company Name 2	Company Name 3
715	16007154	WIDENER, RICK	RLW TRUCKING
716	16007161	SIAS, ROD
717	16007178	FARRELL, RONALD	RONSLUCSHA INC	RONSLUCSHA INC.
718	16007185	HAMILTON, SAM CAL	S&L PACKAGING INC	S & L PACKAGING
719	16007192	CRAIG, SCOTT
720	16007208	BAXTER, SCOTT W
721	16007215	HARRIS, TAMATHA SUSAN	THARRIS ENTERPRISE LLC	THARRIS ENTERPRISES INC
722	16007222	SEBRING, TERRY R.
723	16007239	RYAN, CARY
724	16007246	GLADNEY, MICHAEL B
725	16007253	BOLEN, RENITA LYNN
726	16007260	PYLE, TOMMY E.
727	16007277	DARYL ATKINS	A-NET ENTERPRISES INC.
728	16007284	SMITH, DUSTIN R.
729	16007291	LOVE, MARK A
730	16007307	UMPHRIES, HORACE RICK	QUALITY ENTERPRISES INC
731	16007314	BLACK, STARLENE MAENETTE	ASK INC.
732	16007321	LAWS, JOSHUA BRYAN
733	16007338	JOHNSON, DERRICK ANTHONY
734	16007345	JONES, RICKEY EARL
735	16007352	KRIESE, STEPHEN LAYTON	FLYWAY EXPRESS
736	16007369	DEEGAN, JAMES MICHAEL
737	16007376	MITCHELL, HAROLD
738	16007383	HILL, JOHN DAVID
739	16007390	CHAPMAN, JUSTIN
740	16007406	STRICKLAND, DWIGHT G.
741	16007413	GREENE, MICHAEL PAUL
742	16007420	ELLIOT, JASON
743	16007437	MABONE, MITCHELL
744	16007444	BOLEN, MARVIN QUAY
745	16007451	ERBENTRAUT, ROBERT
746	16007468	DARYL ATKINS	A-NET ENTERPRISES INC.
747	16007475	SCRUGGS, HAROLD W.
748	16007482	CHANDLER, KIMBERLY DAWN
749	16007499	CURTISS, JEFF
750	16007505	WEAVER, JOHN MARK
751	16007512	WHALEN, DANIEL
752	16007529	WADE, SCOTT
753	16007536	HAWKINS, KEVIN
754	16007543	DORSE, WALLACE
755	16007550	PITMAN, JASON	JCB TRANSPORTATION INC
756	16007567	TAMBOLI, DONALD
757	16007574	KELLY, JASON B.
758	16007581	ANDREAS SR., CRAIG STEPHEN
759	16007598	PRICE, NICK	SIMPLICITY COMPANY
760	16007604	POE, JAMES
761	16007611	POOLE, PATSY
762	16007628	HUMPHREY, HERBERT