From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 26, 2023
22-cv-07860 BLF (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-07860 BLF

01-26-2023

GARY L. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge

On December 9, 2022, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a two-page, handwritten “civil complaint” against the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. No. 2. On the same day, the Clerk sent Plaintiff a notice informing him that the IFP application he filed was insufficient because he did not submit the proper form and the necessary supporting documents. Dkt. No. 3. Plaintiff was provided with a blank copy of the Court's IFP application and directed to respond within twenty-eight days to avoid dismissal. Id.

The deadline passed, and Plaintiff failed to respond. The matter was reassigned to this Court on January 11, 2023. Dkt. No. 6. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Smith v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 26, 2023
22-cv-07860 BLF (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Smith v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:GARY L. SMITH, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 26, 2023

Citations

22-cv-07860 BLF (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2023)