From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Entzel

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 22, 2020
No. 20-6049 (4th Cir. May. 22, 2020)

Opinion

No. 20-6049

05-22-2020

MELINDA SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN ENTZEL of SFF HAZELTON, Respondent - Appellee.

Melinda Smith, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:18-cv-00055-GMG) Before NIEMEYER, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melinda Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Melinda Smith, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Smith's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2018) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Entzel, No. 3:18-cv-00055-GMG (N.D.W. Va., Dec. 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Smith v. Entzel

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
May 22, 2020
No. 20-6049 (4th Cir. May. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Smith v. Entzel

Case Details

Full title:MELINDA SMITH, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WARDEN ENTZEL of SFF HAZELTON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: May 22, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6049 (4th Cir. May. 22, 2020)