From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SMITH v. ELY

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 8, 2004
470 Mich. 893 (Mich. 2004)

Opinion

No. 125751.

July 8, 2004.


SC: 125751, COA: 241587, Oakland CC: 00-028364-CZ.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgments of the trial court and the Court of Appeals in part and REINSTATE the jury award of exemplary damages. An award of exemplary damages is justifiable where it is shown that defendant's conduct was malicious, or so willful and wanton as to demonstrate a reckless disregard of the plaintiff's rights. Bailey v. Graves, 411 Mich. 510, 515 (1981). Under the circumstances of this case, the trial court clearly erred in concluding that plaintiff had failed to prove that defendant's conduct was malicious or willful and wanton. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED.


Summaries of

SMITH v. ELY

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jul 8, 2004
470 Mich. 893 (Mich. 2004)
Case details for

SMITH v. ELY

Case Details

Full title:MERCER N. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALEXANDRA E. ELY…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jul 8, 2004

Citations

470 Mich. 893 (Mich. 2004)
683 N.W.2d 145

Citing Cases

Russell v. Novencido

Bailey v Graves, 411 Mich 510, 515; 309 NW2d 166 (1981). See also Smith v Ely, 470 Mich 893; 683 NW2d 145…