From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Diaz

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 19, 2021
4:20-cv-04335-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)

Opinion

4:20-cv-04335-HSG

07-19-2021

C. JAY SMITH, et al., Plaintiff, v. R. DIAZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS DUKE, FRANCO, AND TAYLOR'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO STAY RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE

Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

Defendant Duke, Franco, and Taylor have moved under Northern District Civil Local Rules 6-3 and 7-11 to stay the deadline for them to file a responsive pleading. Having reviewed the administrative motion to stay the responsive pleading deadline and the declaration of Janet N. Chen in support thereof, and good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the request:

The responsive deadline for Defendants Duke, Franco, and Taylor is stayed until 14 days after the Court rules on the pending (12)(b)(6) motion to dismiss filed by Defendants Diaz, Davis, Feston, Haub, and Bloise.

IT IS SO ORDERED..


Summaries of

Smith v. Diaz

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 19, 2021
4:20-cv-04335-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)
Case details for

Smith v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:C. JAY SMITH, et al., Plaintiff, v. R. DIAZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2021

Citations

4:20-cv-04335-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2021)