From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Smith v. Deville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Aug 3, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-01211 P (W.D. La. Aug. 3, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-01211 P

08-03-2018

SANDY SMITH, Plaintiff v. KEITH DEVILLE, ET. AL., Defendants


JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Smith's Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 14), to the extent it can be construed as a Motion to Reopen, is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Smith's Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Request for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 15) are DENIED.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED in Chambers at Alexandria, Louisiana on this 3rd day of August, 2018.

/s/_________

JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Smith v. Deville

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Aug 3, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-01211 P (W.D. La. Aug. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Smith v. Deville

Case Details

Full title:SANDY SMITH, Plaintiff v. KEITH DEVILLE, ET. AL., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 3, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-01211 P (W.D. La. Aug. 3, 2018)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Grodner

The Court does not opine regarding the ultimate likelihood of success of any such claim. See Smith v.…

Davis v. Thompson

Second, it is appropriate to deny the relief requested because the case is closed. See Smith v. Deville, No.…